The appellant failed to appear or file representation in a Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC. The respondent's counsel reported the matter might become infructuous. The Court dismissed the appeal for default and directed pending miscellaneous petitions stand closed.
None; Appeal dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[321s ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY ,THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYFOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHARANI
SECOND APPEAL NO:1424OF 2010
Appeal filed Llnder Section 100 ofC.P.C., aggrievedby the Judgment and decree dated 20.10.2010passedin A.S.No.43 of 2009 on thefile of the lll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad confirmlngthe Judgmentand Decreedated 22.12.2008 passed in O.S.No. 1428 of20O4 onthe file of the ll Junior CivilJudge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad.
Between:
Ahmed Hussain, S/o. Late Shaik Mahboob,Age:61 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 1-8-441411, Chikkadpally,Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT/ APPELLANT/OEFENDANT
AND
C.G. Veera Prakash, S/o. lateGopala Swamy,Age: 35 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 3-2-711 , Kachiguda,Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
l.A. NO: 1OF 2011(SAMP. NO: 1623 0F20111
Between:
C.G. Veera Prakash, S/o. lateGopala Swamy,Age:35years, Occ: Business, R/o. H.No. 3-2-711 , Kachiguda, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER/ RESPONDENT /RESPONDENT
AND
Ahmed Hussain, S/o. Late Shaik Mahboob,Age: 61 years, Occ: Business, R/o. H. No. 1-8-441411 , Chikkadpally,Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT/ PETITIONER / APPELLANT
Petition under Section'151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate order dated 24.12.2010 in SAMP-No.3080/2010 in SA.No.142412010.
Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri H. SUDHAKARA RAO (Not present)
Counsel forthe Respondent : Sri M. MOHAN RAO
The Court delivered the following: JUDGMENT
7
THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI
SECOND APPEAL No.I424 of 2010
JUDGMENT:
This Second Appeal is filed by the appellant-appellant-defendantagainst thejudgment and decree dated 20.10.2010passed in A.S. No.43of 2009 by the III Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Cour1,Hyderabad confirmingthe judgrner.rt and decree dated22.12.2008 passed in O.S. No.1428 of 2004 by theIT Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Cour-t, I{yderabad.
would become infructuous.
failed to argue the matter, the SecondAppealis dismissedfor default. No costs.
As a seq uel, miscellaneouspetitions, pendingif any shallstand closed.
{
/iTRUE COPY//
SD/. M.RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
I
To,
g 5. Two CD CopiesTwo CD Copies
Nih
,a., .::.
I I I i I
HlGH COURT
DATED:0410112024
JUDGMENT
SA.No.1424 of 2010
R 1tl E S14
o sf
U 0 4 ilAn 2024
)(z
*
So4y6'uEo
DISMISSING THE SECOND APPEAL
FOR DEFAULT WITHOUT COSTS
G)o{''
W
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Second Appeal should proceed or be dismissed for default due to the non-appearance of the appellant's counsel.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Ahmed Hussain
C.G. Veera Prakash
G. Radha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
