M. Pentamma R/O Kushaiguda, Hyderabad v. a. Ravinder Reddy and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal filed for default due to non-appearance of appellant; order dated 01.04.2006 from MAC-T treasury judgment affirmed in this matter.
Appeal filed for default due to non-appearance of appellant; order dated 01.04.2006 from MAC-T treasury judgment affirmed in this matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32rs l
IN THEHIGH COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE E]GHTHDAYOF JANUARY "'rwo riousAND AND TwENTY FouR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLEDR. JUSTICEG.RADHARANI
M c.M NO: 1317 0F 206
Appeal filedunder Section 173 of Motor VehiclesAct against the judgment and decreedated 01.04'2006 passed in M V'O'P'No'11of 2023on the file of the "ourtoftheChairman,MotorAccidentClaimsTribunal-cum-SpecialJudgeiorthetriar ofoffences underSCs and srs (poA) Act-cum-Vr Additionar Metropolitan SessionsJudge-cum-XX Additional Chief Judge' Secunderabad'
Between:
M. Pentamma,W/o M. Pentaiah,Business and President of Dwakra F/o t*m2lfi' HanumanColony, Kushaiguda, Hyderabad 62
...APPELLANT/CLAMANT
AND
(R-1 dismissed for ordersof Court order dated 28'06'2016)
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Counsel'.for the Appellant:SRI K. L. N. RAO
Counsel for the RespondentNo.2: SRI R. VENKAT RAO
The Court deliveredthe following:JUDGMENT
r,j i.
:J ii 'J ;t
I
THE HOI\PBLE DT.JUSTICE G.RADHA RI\NI M.A.C.M.A . No.13 17 of2006
JUDGMENT:
'fhis Appeal is filed by the appellant_claimant aggrieved by the award and decree dared 0r.04.2006 passed in o.p.No.rl of 2003 on the fire of the M'A.C.T.-cum-Special Judge for the triar of offences under SCs and srs (PoA) Act -rum-vl Additional Metroporitan Sessions Judge-cum-XX Additional Chief Judge, Secunderabad.
2' when the matter was taken up for hearing on 2g.12.2023, there was no reprcsentation by the learned counsel for the appellant. Hent:e, the matter was directed to be posted to og.or.zo24 under the caption .for dismissar,. Even today also, there is no reprcsentation by the learned counser for the appeilant though the matter is posted under the caption ,for dismissal,. It appears thzLt the appellant is
not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter.
3 I{ence, the appeal is disnrissed for default. No cosrs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending shall stand closed.
)
Sd/- G. SIREESHA ASS]STANT REGISTRAR . , --lIrB'uF.co.PY// .=,rr,Mo"r*
:'i.-';'mY:t
HIGH COURT DATED:0810112024
JUDGMENT MACMA.N0.1317of 2006
DISMISSINGTHE APPEAL FOR DEFAUI.T. WITHOUT GOSTS.
':'..flitl ':Y[j tis
6d(d w_ d{'{'
M. Pentamma
A. Ravinder Reddy
The Branch Manager, National Insurance Co Ltd, R.P. Road, Secunderabad
DR. JUSTICE G. RADHARANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court