The High Court of Telangana dismissed an election petition filed by Kasani Gnaneshwar Mudhiral against the election of Padma Rao from Secunderabad Assembly Constituency as infructuous due to the completion of the election term, without awarding costs.
Election petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
i I
I I
l i
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO
IVONDAY ,THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI
ELECTION PETITION NO: 11 OF 2019
ln the matter of Election of a Member of Legislative Assembly 2018 from 70Secunderabad Assembly Constituency, Hyderabad District.
Between:
Kasani Gnaneshwar Mudhiral, S/o.Late Ramulyl Kasani, Aged 64 years, R/o.1-50, Bachupally (V), Qutubullapur (lV), It/edchal-trla lkajg iri District, Telangana State, Pin500044. ..:PET|T|ONER
AND
t) -rl-..
)
...RESPONDENTS
Election Petition Under Sections 33, 33 (A) 34, 80, 80A, 81 , g3, g4, 100 (1) (d) & 101 of Representation of the People Act, 1951 & the Rules made there Under Read with Rules to Regulate the Trial of Election petitions Under the R.p. Act. lssued by the High Court of Telangana at Hyderabad praying that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to
lA NO: 2 OF 2019
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to strike off the name of respondent No 29 (Returning officer) from the array of respondents rn the aforesaid Election Petition .
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAVI SHANKAR JANDHYALA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI R. SUSHANTH REDDY
Counsel for Respondent No. 4 : SRI G. RAVI CHANDRAN
Counsel for RespondentNos. I & 18 : SRI J.P. SRIKANTH
Counsel for Respondent No. 29 : SRI L. VENKATESHWAR RAO
The Court made the following ORDER:
THE IIONOURABI,E DT. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI
ELECTION PETII'ION No.ll of2019
ORDER:
I-earned counseI for the petitioner reported that the matter
would become infructuous as the ternl ol election is cornpleted
infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any shall stand closed. Sd/. K. SRINIVAS RAO, JOINT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// \g/ SECTION OFFICER
To
kul
\
HIGH COURT
DR.GRRJ
DATED:08/01/2024
ORDER
EP.No.11 of 2019
t\e STAIC:
q v
o
2 2 JAN 2t2 I
ool
,+
*
t
oFSpATc
DISMISSING THE ELECI]ON PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS
WITHOT]T COSTS
(
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kasani Gnaneshwar Mudhiral
Padma Rao
Returning Officer/Revenue Divisional Officer, 70- Secunderabad Assembly Constituency
G. Radha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
