Shakamuri Sravan Kumar v. Shakamuri Haritha
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner for the second consecutive date.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner for the second consecutive date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
clvll- REVISION PETITION NO: 3377 OF 2024
Petition under Article 227 ot the Constitution of lndia, against the Order made in I.A.No.955 OF 2023 in H.M.O.P.No.8 of 2023 dated 09.07.2024 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Warangal.
Between:
Shakamuri Sravan Kumar, S/o. Bhujanga Rao, Aged about 31 years, Occ. Software at HSBC Hyderabad, R/o. 1-'108, Gandhingar Village, Sangem Mandal, Warangal District, Telangana - 506330.
...PETITION ER/RESPONDENT
AND
Shakamuri Haritha, Wo. Sravan Kumar, Aged about 29 years, Occ. Household, R/o. Presently Residing at Narsaraopet Village, Palnadu District, Andhra Pradesh - 522601 .
..RESPONDENT/PLAI NTIFF
tA NO: 2 OF 2024
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in ttrc circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the H(1h Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of operation of order in l.A. No. 955 of 2023 in H.M.O.P. No. 8 of 2023, daled 0910712024, by the learned Honourable Senior Civil Judge, Warangal District at Hanumakonda.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRl. K.R. SUNIL KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI SUBBA RAO POSANI
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION N9.33770F 2o24
ORDER:
No one appears for the petitioner
2 This is rhr: second r:onsecutivc datc u,hen Lhe petilioncr is unrepresented
a The proceeding sheets show that counsel appearing for the petttloner has prayed for an adjournment on 10. 12.2024 and petitioner is not interested in pursuing with the litigation 4.
C.R.p.No,3377 o[ 202-4, along with a]l connected
applicatrons, is accordingll. <lismisscd Ibr dclaulr Intorim orders, if any, shall s;tand vacated. There shall be no order as to costs
//TRUE COPY//
Sd/. V. HARI PRASAD ASSlsrANr
.,9r** / SECTfON OFFICER
To,
I I,"Senior Civil Judge, Waranoat 4. i, Two iiE CD EE is CooiesTwo iiE CD EE is CooiesCD EE is CooiesCooiesSt 5#,.,,[Lt*a:; ltnt?sya,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1111212024
ORDER
CRP.No.3377 of 2024
o R r HE Sth /6.
6
oo i ri
O E JAl\l 2025
utt
Or.,, o4 r6r ri:(
Dismissing the C.R.P for default without costs.
G*f4ft,
Shakamuri Sravan Kumar
Shakamuri Haritha
Moushumi Bhattacharya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court