Revision petition dismissed as withdrawn. Petitioner parties accompanied by elders amicably resolved disputes. Compromise memo filed before Registrar seeking court permission to withdraw the case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGHCOURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THEFOURTH DAY OF SEPTEIUBER TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEE.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINAL REVISIONCASE NO:859 0F 2023
Criminal Revisionfiled under Section 397 & 401 of Cr'P C ' aggrieved by the orderdated.10.11.2023,passedin Criminal Appeal No.144 of 2023,in crl.tvl.P.No.405of2022,inDVCNo.60/202',l,bytheAdditionallvletropolitan Sessions Judge,Cyberabad, at L B Nagar' Rangareddy District'
Between:
smt. PotukuchiPushva,Wo Mr Potukuchi-Venkata M?: 9i:{f,"*ffi:: Siihr;.ih;,'-;q,ed 2li vear.residing at .Flat Meadows,NewNagole Main road Hyderaoao
...PETITIONER/REVISIONPETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
lA NO:1oF 2023
Petition underSection482 of Cr'P C 'praying that in thecircumstances statedintheaffidavitfiledinsupportofthepetition'theHighcourtmaybe pleased to pass the orderdirectingand restraining the Respondentsfrom alienatingt heir propertiesat Alta Vista Apartment-in Mumbai and Duplex Villa
$: .;i' 1'-t at Door No.5-12-77 tT,takhmipuri Colony, High Tension Road, Sainikpuri, Secundeabad.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRIy. LAKNA REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : pUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG) Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 & 5 : SRI K. SAI AKARSH
Counsel forthe Respondent No.3 & 4 : NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following : ORDER
rl
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEE.V. VENUGOPAL
CRIMINALREVISION CASE No.859 0F 2023
ORDER:
Learned counsel for thepetitioner would submit that the cause in this revisionpetitiondoes not survive as the partieshave already been compromisedbefore the JudicialMagistrate of First Class-Special(Mobile) PCR Act, Ranga Reddy District -cum- IV Additional Judicial Magistrateof First Class -cum- IV AJCJ' RangaReddyDistrictatL.B.Nagar(hereinafterreferredas..trial Court) and the trialCourt recorded the compromiseand disposed of the DVCNo.62 of 2O2lvid'e orders dated27 'Oa'2O24 and the ( I nature of disPosalis withdrawn .
Ir
2
4 . Recording the submissions oflearned counsel for the revisionpetitior-rer, noobjection reported by iearned counsel for the unofficial r,:spondentsald upon perusing the memo filedby the revisionper,itionerbefore the Registry, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.
As a sequel, pending misceilaneousapplications, ifany,
shall stand closred.
Sd/- T. SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGISTFAR
\ To,
//TRUE GOPY//
\
SECTION OFFICER
Pcsd/gh
t-
:,t
HIGH COURT
DATED:04l0gl2024
ORDER
CRLRC.No.859 of 2023
*'
oFr
e €q
4,1
o9
,5$t
oc
Flr \\ Ii I
$
)
t
o
),H +
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL WITHDRAWN
REVISION CASE AS
smt. Potukuchi Pushva and Mr Potukuchi-Venkata
The State of Telangana, Through The Public Prosecutor
Potukuchi Venkata Naga Sathya Naveen
Mr. Potukuchi Venkata Subrahmanya Kutumba Rao
Smt. Potukuchi Nirmala
Mr. Potukuchi Sachin Sidhardha
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
