The Court held that the cause of action for the writ petition challenging the election of Sarpanch had become infructuous as the tenure of the post was completed in 2011. Accordingly, the petition was closed without costs.
The writ petition was closed; pending miscellaneous petitions were also closed. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
s[ 32991
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL
WRIT PETITION NO: 12168 OF 2009
Between:
Mumai Ramesh, S/o. Dharmaraj, aged39 yrs,Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Basar Village, Mandal Mudhole, District Adilabad.
...'ET'T'ONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution oflndiaprayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiled therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for therecords relating to and connected with thejudgment and decree as madein o,P.No. 412006 on the file of Juniorcivil Judge, Bhainsa dated 16-6-2009and quash the same by holdingthe same as being illegal, arbitrary and is againstthe established judicial precedents.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2009(WPMP. NO: 15714 OF2009 )
Petition under section 151 cPCpraying thatin the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition,the High Court may be pleasedto suspend the operation of thejudgment anddecreeas madein O P.No. 4/2006 on
the file of Junior Civil Judge,Bhainsadated 16-6-2009, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.
LA. NO: 1 OF 20090VVMP. NO: 1887 OF 2009 )
Between:
Sri N.sudershan Rao, S/o. Raidu, aged 48yrs, Occ:Agriculture, R/o. Basar, Mandal Mudhole, Diskict Adilabad A.P.
..,PETITIONER/RESPONDENT.l AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the HighCourt may be pleasedto vacate the interim order dated 22.6.2009passed in WPMPNo. 15714of 2009in WP No 12168 ol 2009
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SURENDER RAO, SENIOR COUNSELFOR SRI V.RAMCHANDER GOUD Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI VENKATESWARLU POSANI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 TO 4: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.S: -
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICEE.V.VENUGOPAL
t I
WRIT PETITIONNo. 12168 of 2OO9
ORDER:
This Writ Petition, underArticle 226 of the Constitution of
India, is filedby the petitioners seeking the followingrelief:
"-...ro issue aWit, Orderor directionmoreparticularly one in the noture of Writ ofCertiorari calling forthe records relating to and connected uith he nag^ent andDecreedated, 16.06.2009in O.P.No.4 of 2o06 on the fileof lhe Junior CiuilJudge,Bho.insaandquash the proceedings therein. ..'
2
S [,e arned Assistzrn t Government Pleader for PanchavatRa.; well as learned counsel for respondent No.1 fairl1' conceded with the version of the learned Senior Counsel
/
SD'. V. KAVITHA //'RUEcoPY'/^tt*l};ml,:::
To
1 2 J i*l:tt4l#Nffiiiiw,,iffi:**;i: 4 Two CDCoPies PSK. EK LS
c'urr''ihe
t I
HIGH COURT
DATED:0310912024
ORDER
WP.No.12168 of 2009
tt re Sl'i' t",
j3
o--] 11 [tt' tr^l
O
*<Il--
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION
WITHOUT GOSTS.
Yfrr[Il-r l-c"eisf
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the election of Sarpanch survives after the completion of the tenure in 2011.
Mumai Ramesh
Sri N.sudershan Rao
The District Election Officer
The Deputy District Election Officer
The Mandal Parishad Development Officer
The Returning Officer
E.V. Venugopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
