Allowed

Mohd. Mateen Qureshi v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC19 Sept 2024CRLP/7480/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed criminal petition and compounders after parties reached amicable settlement. Proceedings under SCs/STs (PoA) Act were quashed subject to payment of Rs. 10,000 to Sainik Welfare and High Court Advocates Association within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings in SC SPL No. 77 of 2023 quashed; I.A. Nos. 2 and 3 allowed subject to payment of Rs. 10,000 to nominees within two weeks.

Mohd. Mateen Qureshi Vs The State of Telangana — Caste Atrocities | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³³⁸⁵ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT^{FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY,THE NINETEENTH^{DAY OF SEPTEMBER} TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY^FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT.^{JUSTICE K. SUJANA}

¶6

l.A.Nos . 2 AND 3 0F 2024 IN/AND CRIMINAL PETITIO N NO:^{7480 OF 2024}

¶7

Between:

¶8

Mohd. Mateen Qureshi, S/o.^{Mohd Khaja Qureshi,Aged 32 years,Occ'} Business, R/o.H.No.10-2, Kandi^{villageand Mandal, Sangareddy District'}

¶9

.. Petitioner/Accused

¶10

AND

¶11

1 The state of Telangana, rep.by^{Public Prosecutor, High court for the state of} Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶12

...Respondent

¶13

Gaiire Ganqaram, S/o.^{LateDavalji,Aged62 years, CasteSC-Dhor, Occ'} Co6lie, R/o:9-98/i, Kandi^{village andMandal Sanga ReddyDistrict'}

¶14

...ResPondents/ComPlainant

¶15

Petition under Section^{482 of cr.P-c praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Groundsof criminal Petition,the High court may} be pleased to Quash^{the proceedings againstthe petitioner/accu sed in sc.sPl} No.77t2023, on the file^{of learned lll Additional District and Session Judge cum} Speciat court for the^{Trial of offencesUnder scs/sTs (PoA) Act, SangaReddy} District at Sanga^ReddY.

¶16

l.A. NO: 1OF 2024

¶17

Petition under Section^{4B2 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum^{of Grounds of criminal Petition, the Highcourt may} be pleased to stay all^{furtherproceedingsin SC. No 77l2O23'on the file of} learned lll Additional District^{and session Judge cum Special court For the Trial} of Offences Under SCs/STs^{(POA) Act,Sanga ReddyDistrict at SangaReddy'} pending disposal of the above^{criminal petition-}

¶18

l.A.NOos:2&3OF 2024

¶19

Between:

¶20

' Qajire^{Gangaram,S/o. Late-Davalji,Aged 62 years,} Caste, SC_Dhor, Occ. Coolie, R/o. 9-98/1, Kandi viilage an'd Mindal Sahgi iieddy Distrrct.

¶21

...Petitioner/Respondent No.2

¶22

AND

¶23

1 The state of relangana, rep.by pubric prosecutor, High court for the state of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶24

...Respondent No 1/Respondent

¶25

Mohd. Mateen eureshi, S/o. Mohd Khaja eureshi, Aged :.t2 years, Occ Business, R/o H No 10-2, Kandi village and tr,tanOat, Sang;reOiy diiiri"i -"

¶26

...Respondent No.2/petitioner

¶27

Petition under section 320(6) of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminai petition, the High C;r;;;y be pleased to permit the^ petitioner/Respondent No.2 io Co.;r;; ;; withdraw the case in SC SpL No. 72 r202d, on the fire of rearnec'rrr nooitio""r P:tl,:l^{and_ SessionJudge cum SpecialCourt For the Trait} Otfences Under SCs/STs (POA) Act, Sanga Reddy District at Sanga Reddy against the Respondent No.2/petitioner in the interest of justice.

¶28

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2024

¶29

Petition under Section 320(2) of cr.p.c praying that in the <;ircumstances stated rn the Memorandum of Grounds of criminai petition, the High cou.t ,"y be preased to record the compromise and quash the proceedings a's against tne Respondenvpetitioner in sc spL No. zilzoi3, on the fire of reained rriiooii,onrr ?f^{,r,:l and} ^Session^{Judge cum SpecialCourt For the Trail} Of"n"""^-finO".. SCs,STs (PoA) Act, sanga Reddy District at sanga Reddy, in tn" int"r".t-or lustice.

¶30

This Petition comrng on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminar petition and upon hearing the arguments of sri chekurr Yadagiri Advocate for the petitioner and the Assistant pubric prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of sri yerrofla Joseph, Advr:cate for the Respondent No. 2

¶31

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

, t

THE HON'BLE^{SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA}

¶37

I.A.Nos-2 ar.d3^of2o.24 ut ard AL PEfI^{TIONNo.748O ol 2o24}

¶38

coMMON^oRDER:

¶39

It is submitted^{by learned counsel appearingfor the} petitioneraswellasrespondentNo.2,thatduringpendencyof the present^{Criminal Petition' the parties have compromisedthe} matter and^{accordingly,I'A'Nos'2 and 3 of 2024lnave been filed} to record^{the compromise between them and to compoundthe} offences.

¶40

Vide order^{dated' 29} '08'2024'^{this Courtdirected the} parties along^{with their respective counselto appear before the} Secre tary,^{HighCourt lrgal ServicesCommittee'HighCourt for} the State^{of Telangana,Hyderabad' for identifrcationandto} submit^{a rePort.}

¶41

Pursuant^{to the above said directionissued by this Court'} the^{parties have appeared and the Secretary' High CourtLegal} Services^{Committee,has identifiedthe partiesand submitteda} report,^{dated06.09.2024 and the same is placed on record'}

¶42

In view of^{the above, I'A'Nos'2 and 3 of 2024 are allowed'} Consequently,^{this CriminalPetition} 1S allowed^{and the} proceedings tn Spl.S.C.No.77^{of2023 on the file o[ the lll} Additional^{District and SessionJudge-Cum-SpecialCourt for}

¶43

¶44

¶45

the trial of offences under SCs/STs (pOA) Act, Sanga Reddy District at Sanga Reddy, against the pefitione r/accused are hereby quashed subject to the pedtioner paying an amount of Rs.5,O00/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to the Director, Sainik Welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52lgg 9262\9, State Bank of India, Shantinagar Branch (2OOZO),IFSC Code:SBINOO2OO7O, MICR No.soo0040s7) and Rs.S,Ooo/- (Rupees Five Thousand Only) to rhe Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad. within a period of two (O2) weeks from today and lile proof of the same before the Reg.istry.

¶46

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed

¶47

sd/V. KAVITHA ASSISTAN\ REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1 2 3 Il#tlr*fi+f g##1fu mi+,,r'"i^-iigffi " 4 H sh c'u( r'r'[he 5. 6. 7. F}}t{^{,p#f$-ilrylf;td,;;,,,r5,,-"ee}

¶52

Njbigh

¶53

¶54

(ALONG wtTH A COpy oF JOTNT MEMo oF COMPROMISE)

¶55

;1".j,:::1J,::,n;! o?ill::, Note: Total Amount or Rs 10.0O0/_ ro, tr,._Fltit"ion"i" ( Rupees Ten "l"X,,""t.o thous-and only^by ) has been^{the rlon bre} paid^court by "o,."to,s"inti*;#';;:"?:r!!,!.!fl ;,,iT,i::ili*nllf j.:,y; to the Telangana High court noro"ri.. n...iJli,-Hvo"obad and flted Memo is proor or comptiance USR No gtts2 or 2oiilltul,z6,os.zozo

¶56

HIGH COURT

¶57

DATED:19 t09t2024

¶58

COMMON ORDER l.A.Nos.2&3ot2024 ln/and CRLP.No.t4B0 ot 2024

¶59

E ii
{ (,,,
t
0 7 |\lot, 20?l
').
a
5
:

¶60

ALLOWNG BOTH THE I.A'S & CRIMINAL PETITION 0)+* *o---{Af

¶61

,'4 )

¶62

MEMORANDUM Ot. CRIMINAL MISC. PETMON

¶63

(UNDER SEC. 482 OF CRIMTNAL PROCEDURE CODE)

¶64

IN THE HIGH COURT T-OR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

I.A.No.

oF 2024

CRL.P.No.

oF 2024

BETWEEN:

Gajire Gangaram S/o late Davalji, Aged 62 years, Caste: SC-Dtror, Occ Cooolie R/o 9-98/1 Kandi village & Mandal Sanga Reddy District. ...^{petitioner/Respondent} No.2

¶72

AND

¶73

The State of Telangana rep.by Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

¶74

Mohd. Mateen Qureshi, S/o Mohd Khaja Qureshi, aged 32, Occ Busines, R/o.H.No.10-2 Kandi village 8r Mandal, Sangareddy District. ... Responden(Petitioner

¶75

JOINT MEMO

¶76

It is submitted that the petitioner/Respondent No.2 and the respondent No.z/Petitioner herein have resolved their issues outside the court and entered into an amicable settlement. It is submitted that due to a misconception dispute arose between them. Both Parties resolved their problems amicably before the

S.P^r1)

! I

village elders, Hence, they compromised with the above

¶81

understanding, which resurted in firing the present Joint Memo.

¶82

Hence this loint Memo €=Pr-,. Petitioner/R2 Resp n ent No.2 /petitioner ,l' Hyderabafl DATE:2846-2024

¶83

Counsel r titioner/it2 Counsel fo eRe ndent No.2 /Petitioner

Mohd. Mateen Qureshi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd. Mateen Qureshi v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Management of South Glass Company Vs The State of Telangana

Kishore Singh Vs The State of Telangana

Thota Venu Vs The State of Telangana

Eranolla Lokeshwara Vs Sat Yalamanchili

Jolapally Praveen Kumar Vs The State of Telangana

Mohd Osman Qureshi Vs The State of Telangana