The High Court dismissed Criminal Petitions seeking the quashing and stay of criminal proceedings by allowing the petitions to be withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh application later.
Permission to withdraw Criminal Petition with liberty to file fresh application at appropriate time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10900 OF 2024
Between:
.PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos. 1 & 2
AND
Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the criminal proceedings against the Petitioners/ Accused Nos. 1 and 2 in Crime No. 91 ot 2024 of P.S. Kamanpur, dated 04.09.2024, for the offences u/s. 296(b), 351(3), r/w. 3(5) or BNS, Sec.3(1)(rXs), 3(2Xva) of SC ST POA Act.
l.A NO: 2OF 2024
Petition under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings including the arrest of the Petitioners/ Accused Nos. 1 and 2 herein in Crime No.91 of 2024 of P.S. Kamanpur, dated O4.O9.2A24, for the offences uis. 296(b), 351(3), r/w. 3(5) of BNS, Sec.3(1[r)(s), 3(2Xva) of SC ST POA Act.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Bavandlapelli Naresh, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the Respondent No. 2.
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SMT. WSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL PETITION No.lO9OO of 2o24
ORDER:
l,earned counsel for petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the Criminal Petition with liberty t.o file fresh application at an appropriate time.
2 Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as withdra'*rn giving liberty as sought for.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also
stand closed
Sd/. T. TIRUMALAy'EVI ASSISTANT REGIStrRAR
('
//TRUE coPY//
sEcroN oFFrcER
To,
LSR/DL
HIGH COURT
DATEOt18l0gl2q24
a=-:r:_
\rj 1 -<br>',..,r).<br>'J, I
I t1 t ',. ,i
i! + lut :'i
,l
.t*
ORDER _//
ll-
CRLP.No.'10900 of 2024
DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PET|TION AS WTHDRAWN
o<br>o..
-\ep
1 issue framed by the court
Whether criminal proceedings u/s. 296(b), 351(3) of BNS and SC ST POA Act may be withdrawn.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
NoneReferred
5 provisions across 3 enactments
Thota Venu
Thota Lachaiah
The State of Telangana
Krishna Sagar Sri Perambuduri
Justice K. Sujana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
