Dismissed

Mekala Raghuma Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC8 Feb 2024CRLP/6186/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed to quash proceedings in FW.No.728 of 2023 was dismissed as infructuous because a charge sheet was already laid. The petitioner was granted liberty to move a fresh petition if the cause survives.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as infructuous; liberty granted to move a fresh petition in case the cause survives.

Mekala Raghuma Reddy Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT FOR THE^{STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD}

¶2

THURSDAY,THE^{EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY} TWO THOUSAND^{AND TWENTY FOUR}

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE^{SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA}

¶5

CRIMIN AL^{PETITIONNO:6186oF 2023}

¶6

Between:

¶7

Mekala Raghuma^{Reddy,S/o.Narasimha Reddy,Aged about 45 years'Occ} Telangana

¶8

...PETIT]ONER

¶9

AND

¶10

1, The State of^{Telangana,Rep.by its Public Prosecutor' High Court for the} State of^{Telangana,HYderabad.}

¶11

2 M/s. lndukuri^{Life spacesLLP, 1st} ''oo' '*""^{J'lj:t:"=J:Iil} - ivJ"rioro, Tealgana Tealgana - 500 033, 500 033, rep.throug,h- S'Naveen Kumar' S'Naveen Kumar' Aged aboutabout

¶12

ivJ"rioro, Tealgana Tealgana - 500 033, 500 033, rep.throug,h- S'Naveen Kumar' S'Naveen Kumar' Aged aboutabout r.iii r**n v"ursl occ^{Sales Manager, INCOR 9, 1st Floor' AboveD Mart'} Kavuri Hills' Hvderabad-3l..oEFAcro

¶13

coMpLAtNANT/RESPoNDENT^No'2

¶14

Petition under^{Section482 of Cr.P.C prayingthat in the circumstances} stated in the^{Memorandumof Groundsof criminalPetition, the Highcourtmay} ;;';;;."J to^{quashthe FlR.No.728 of 2023 on the file of P's} '^Madhapur' Cyberabad.

¶15

r.A. NO: oF 2023

¶16

Petition under Section^{482 of Cr.P.C prayingthat in the circumstances} statedintheMemorandumofGroundsofcriminalPetition,theHighcourtmay o" prlr."o to stay^{a[ further proceedingsin FlR.No.7zAof 2023 on the fite of} P.S., Madhapur,^CYberabad.

¶17

This Petition coming on^{for hearing, upon} Perusing^{the Memorandum} .of Grounds of Criminal^{Petition and upon hearing the argumentsof Sri P N ARUN} iuutnn, Advocate^{for the petitioner and the public prosecutoron behalf of the} Respondent No.1 and^{none appearedfor the RespondentNo 2'}

¶18

The Court made the^{following:ORDER}

¶19

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.6186 of 2023

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

The present Criminal Petition is f-rled seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in Crime No.728 of 2023 of Madhapur Police Station, Cyberabad

¶22

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on written instructions, submitted that charge sheet is laid and therefore, the Crimina.l Petition has become infructuous.

¶23

Recording the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuou s granting liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh petition in case the cause survlves

¶24

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed

¶25

SD/- P. CH. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

¶26

//TRUE COPY//

¶27

w SECTION OFFICER

¶28

To, 1. The X Additronal Nletropolitan^{lilagistrate,Cyberabadat Kukatpally.}

¶29

The Station House Officer,^{Police Station Madhapur, Cyberabad District.}

¶30

One CC to SRI^{P N ARUN KUMARAdvocate} [OPUC]

¶31

Two CCs to PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of^Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI.

¶32

Two CD Copies

drj"k c,w

HIGH COURT

DATED:0810212O24

t ORDER

CRLP.No.6'186 of 2023

¶41

B.; 1,E Sr4 14.
7,, (
(:
i() 0E tpn Wt
d.. ,
_i
I * .{€

¶42

CRLP IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

¶43

.-r$"

Mekala Raghuma Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mekala Raghuma Reddy v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anirudh Prasad Kankani Vs The State of Telangana

Byreddy Sandeep Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Manj u Kaul Vs The State of Telangana

Md. Haneef Vs The State of Telangana

Koya Praveen Kumar Reddy Vs the State of Telangana

Annaboina Thirupathi Yadav @ at Yadav Vs The State of Telangana