Dismissed

Md. Ankushavalli v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC21 Feb 2024CRLP/2028/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court held that a petition under Section 482 CrPC to quash domestic violence proceedings is not maintainable as the DV Act affords an effective remedy via appeal. Instead, the appearance of members of the respondents in the DV case was dispensed with pending the hearing, and the Criminal Petition was dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Appearance of petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 in DVC No. 126 of 2021 dispensed with; petition dismissed.

Md. Ankushavalli Vs State of Telangana — Domestic Violence | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENry FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR

¶3

:PRESENT:

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:2028 oF 2024

¶6

Between:

¶7

1 Md. Ankushavali, S/o. Mohd. Ari aged about 63 years occ. retired sinoareni e.mptoyee R:/o. S-92-s, At, Essu:peta, f.lear fuiJiO M"d6;;#;;i, Karimnagar District.

¶8

Md. Musthaffa, S/o. Md. ankushvalli aged about 25 years Occ. ovt v"'|p'|vremolov ee

¶9

v"'|p'|vremolov

¶10

-^{R/o.H.no.Hanumannagar,srirampurManctr-eriirbisiiidi} 3. Md Rizvana, wo. D/o.ankusnvatir aged iboJi ss-t"rrs occ. house wife Rl/o. H.No.14-70 RK6, Gudiseru, Srirampuicorony, trri#neriat, urJncn"iiaiiiiitri"[ ... Petitioners/Respondent No. 1 to 3

¶11

1 PJate of Tetangana, rep b.y. ils frffBlgseculor, High Court at Hyderabad 2 Md Sahida Begum, Wo..[Id. Anushvafliaged itidu:t-eo veirs-o#.-ilo=r1i-wire Rl/o H.No. 2-6-31246-A, Husanipura, Xarlfinigir.^--

¶12

... Respondent

¶13

Petition under Section zrg2 of cr.p.c, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the criminar petition, the High court may be pleased to call for the records rerating to DVC No. 12612021on the fire of the court of the Addl. Judiciar Magistrate of First crass (pcR) at Karimnagar and to quash the same against the petitionersirespondents No 1 to 3.

¶14

lA NO: 2 oF 2024

¶15

Petition under section 492 0f cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to grant stay of all further proceedings in DVc No. 12612021 on the file of the court of the Addl Judicial Magistrate of First crass (pcR) at Karimnagar incruding the appearance of the petitioners/respondent No. 1 to 3, pending disposar of cRLp 2028 ot 2024, on the fite of the High Court.

¶16

The Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Gudi Madhusudhan Reddy Advocate for the petitione(s), Asst. public prosecutor Advocate for the Respondent No.1 and none appeared for the Respondent No.2.

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

THE HON'BLE SMT.^{WSTICE K. SUJANA}

¶19

CRIMIT{AL^{PETITIO!{No.228 of 204}

¶20

ORDER:

¶21

This Criminal^{Petition is filed underSection 482 of the Code of} Criminal Proced.ure,^{1973 (for short'Cr'P'C'J by the petitioners/ respondent} Nos. 1 to 3 to^{quash the proceedingsagainst them in D'V'C'No'126 of 2O2l}

¶22

file of Additional Judicial^{First Class Magistrate(PCR),} I \ Pending^{on the} ( Karimnagar.

¶23

Heard the learned^{counselfor the petitioners and the learnedAssistant} Public Prosecutor^{for respondentNo.1} -^{State Perusedthe record'}

¶24

In the light of^{the judgmentia CiaddameediNagama;nla' State ol} Telolngana|apetitiontoquashtheproceedingsinDomesticViolenceCase isnotmaintainable,asSection2goftheProtectionofWomenfromDomestic Violence Act,2OO5^{affords an efficacious remedy by way ofan appeal against} the act of the Court^{below in takingcognizance and numberingthe D'V'C'}

¶25

4 Inviewoftheabove,thepetitionersareatlibertytoavailthesaid altemative remedY

¶26

However, in^{view,)f the request made by the learned counselfor the} petitioners, the appearance^{of the petitioncrNos'2 and 3 herein/respondent} Nos.2 and 3 in^{D.V.C.No - 126 ol 2O2 Ipending on the file of Additional} JudicialFirstClassMagistrate(PCR},Karimnagar,isdispensedwith,except on the dates,,vhenever^{tlleir presenceis required by the trial court,and they}

¶27

'^{2ols (2\ ALD (cRL. ) 764}

¶28

¶29

sha-ll be represented by their counsel on every date of hearing and in case of

¶30

default, this order gets vacated automatically

¶31

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.

¶32

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed

¶33

Sd/.N.SRIH ASSISTANT REG T

//TRUE COPY//

\ To,

SECTION OFFICER

The Addl. Judicial Magistrate of First Class (pCR) at Karimnagar 2. One CC to Sri. Gudi Madhusudhan Reddy Advocate [OpUC] 3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies. YIR g

HIGH COURT

DATED:21 10212024

ORDER

CRLP.No.2O28 ot 2024

a(
ooJ 18 hPfr wu
oz
.a'
* t
9e9trcl6H. riJ

¶44

DISPOSING OF THE CRL.P.

¶45

.t @cor,'

Md. Ankushavalli v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Ankushavalli v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Agniparthi Sudeep Vs The State of Telangana

Patolla Kasinath Rao Vs State of Telangana

Kommireddy Shailendra Vs The State of Telangana

Gajula Rama Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Yedla Ratnanjali Vs The State of Telangana

Kompally Ravindar Vs The State of Telangana