Disposed

Kompally Ravindar v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC21 Feb 2024CRLP/2047/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought to quash criminal proceedings. Court held disputed facts required trial court intervention, thus restricted prayer to dispensation with personal appearance. Criminal petition disposed by dispensing appearance.

What did the court decide?

Dispensation with personal appearance of petitioners before trial court. Appearance required only if specifically needed during trial.

Kompally Ravindar Vs The State of Telangana — Quashing and FIR | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANAAT^HYDERABAD

¶2

WEDNEDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF^FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND^TWENTYFOUR

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE SMT IUSTICE K^SUJANA

¶5

¶6

Between:

¶7

Kompaily Ravindar, S/o.^Devaiah, Aged about 33^years, Occ. Labour,

¶8

Kompally Yesamma @ Yesumani, W/o.^Devaiah, Aged about 63 years, Occ. Labour,

¶9

Both R/o. H.No.1-26, Shivaipally^Village, Shankarampet Mandal, Sanga^{Reddy District,T.S}

¶10

...Petitio ner/Accused No.1 & 2

¶11

AND

¶12

The State ofTelangana, through S.H.O., Kalher P.S., Sangareddy District, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State ofTelangana, at Hyderabad.

¶13

Smt. Kompally Anila, W/o. Ravinder, Aged about 30^years, Occ. Housewife, R/o. Shivaipally Village, Shankarampet-A^M-andal, Sangareddy District, Present R/o.^{Bachepally Village,} Kalher Mandal, Sangareddy District.

¶14

.Respondent

¶15

...Respondent/ Defacto Complainant

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of^{Cr.P.Cpraying that in the circumstances stated} in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal^{Petition, the HighCourt may be pleased} ro Quash the proceedings in C.c. No.^{750 of 202! on the file of the fudicial} Magistrate of First Class, at Narayankhed,^{SangareddyDistrict.}

¶17

I.A. NO: 1 oF 2024

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of^{Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated} in the Memorandum of Grounds of^{Criminal Petition, the HighCourtmay be pleased} to stay all further^proceedings in c.c.^{No. 76o of zo2lon the file of the} fudicial Magistrate of First Class, at Narayankhed,^{SangareddyDistrict.}

¶19

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Ms. Gadiraju Rajeshwari, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1.

¶20

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶21

THE HONOURABLE SMT. WSTICE K. SUJANA

¶22

CRIMTNAL PETITION No.2O47 of 20.24

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

In this criminal petition, the petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos. 1 and 2, seek to quash the proceedings against them in C.C.No-76O of 2O2l pending on the frle of Judicial Firsr Class Magistrate at Narayankhed, Sanga Reddy District.

¶25

After arguing for some time, when this Court has expressed its opinion stating that the said contentions are disputed questions of fact which need to be gone into by the trial Court, learned counsel for the petitioners restricted his prayer to the extent of dispensing with the presence of the petitioners before the trial Court.

¶26

Hence, the appearance of the petitioners before the trial Court is dispensed with unless their presence is specihcally required during the course of trial, subject to the condition of petitioners being represented by their counsel on every date of hearing.

¶27

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is disposed of. pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Criminal petition shall also stand closed.

¶28

SD/-V.HARI PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //rRUEcoPY//

¶29

SECTIO OFFICER

¶30

To,

¶31

1 The fudicial Magistrate of First Class, at Narayankhed, Sangareddy District 2 One CC to Sri Gadiraju Raleshwari, Advocate [OPUC] 3 One CC to The Public Prosecutor, for the state ofTelangana at Hyderabad [OPUC] 4 Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State ofTelangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

5-, ru,.,\c\7tc,Fre,

HIGH COURT

DATED:27/2/2024

ORDER

CRLP.No.2047 of 2024

1 $E STA;- i)
i (
1 B IPB E2I
o()
.=-/

¶38

CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISPOSED OF

Kompally Ravindar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kompally Ravindar v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Agniparthi Sudeep Vs The State of Telangana

Patolla Kasinath Rao Vs State of Telangana

Kommireddy Shailendra Vs The State of Telangana

Gajula Rama Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Yedla Ratnanjali Vs The State of Telangana

Molla Shivaiah @ Shiva Kumar Vs The State of Telangana