Disposed

Smt. Yedla Ratnanjali v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC21 Feb 2024CRLP/2021/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Criminal Petition under CrPC s. 482 filed to quash proceedings and stay appearance of accused No. 2. Court allowed appearance only by counsel unless specifically required, disposing of petition on disputed facts needing trial.

What did the court decide?

Appearance of petitioner before trial Court is dispensed with unless presence is specifically required during trial; petitioner to be represented by counsel on every date.

Smt. Yedla Ratnanjali Vs The State of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

t^3385I

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENry FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2021 OF 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

Smt. Yedla Ratnanjali, Wo. Om Prakash, Aged about 67 Years, Occ.^Retd. Employee, R/o. H.No. 1-2-2-211117111c, Plot No.^'103, Lalitha Constructions, Domalguda, Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad.

¶9

,..PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.2

¶10

AND

¶11

The State of Telangana, through S.H.O., Ramayampet P.S.,^{Medak District,Rep by} Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad.

¶12

Smt. Yedla Jyothi, W/o. V'rjay Shiva Prasad, aged about 33^{years, Occ. Housewife,} Rl/o. H.No. 1:2-2-21111711lc, Plot No. 103, Lalitha constructions, Domalguda,^Ashok Nagar, Hyderabad. Now residing at Rayalapur Village, Ramayampet^Mandal,Medak District

¶13

...RE''.NDENTS/..M'LATNANTS

¶14

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the^{High Court maybe} pleased to Quash the proceedings in C.C. No. 364 of 2023 on the file of Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Medak to the extent of^{petitioner herein/Accused No. 2.}

¶15

l.A. NO: 'l OF 2024

¶16

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C^praying that^{in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,^{the High Court may be} pleased to Stay all further proceedings to the extent of petitioner herein/Accused No.2 in C.C. No. 364 of 2O23 on the file of Judicial First^{ClassMagistrate,at} Medak including the appearance of the^petitioner herein,^{pending disposal of the} above Criminal Petition.

¶17

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^{perusingthe Memorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing^{the arguments of Sri Gadiraju} Rajeshwari, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Asst.^{Public Prosecutor on behalf} of the Respondent No.'1 and of the Respondent^{No.2 is not appearingin personor} by Advocate.

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

¶20

THE HONOURABLE SMT. WSTICE K. SUJANA

¶21

CRTMINAL PETITION No.2O2L of 2o24

¶22

ORDER

¶23

In this criminal petition, the petitioner, who is accused No.2, seek to quash the proceedings against her in C.C.No.364 of 2023 pendingon the hle of the Judicial First Class Magistrate at Medak.

¶24

After arguing for some time, when this Court has expressed its opinion stating that the said contentions are disputed^questions of fact which need to be gone into by the trial Court, learned counsel for the petitioner restricted his prayer to the extent of dispensing with the presence of the petitioner before the trial Court.

¶25

Hence, the appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is dispensed vrith unless his presence is specifically required during the course of trial, subject to the condition of petitioner being represented by his counsel on every date of hearing.

¶26

Accordingh', the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Criminal Petition sha-[ also stand closed.

¶27

SD/.V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// L---

¶28

SECNO( OFFICER

¶29

To,

¶30

The Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Medak

¶31

The Station House Officer, Ramayampet Police Station, Medak District.

¶32

One CC to Sri Gadiraju Rajeshwari, Advocate IOPUCI

¶33

Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana (OUT)

¶34

Two CD Copies

¶35

BJLB

HIGH COURT

DATEO:211O212024

ORDER

CRLP.No.2021 of 2024

CRIMINAL PETITION IS OISPOSED OF

¶44

o B 1r{E S 14 Ie
oo
I
10 APB n2t
.,' /
t 9//
spa Y;u*"-r'

¶45

@"T*

¶46

.yY

Smt. Yedla Ratnanjali v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Yedla Ratnanjali v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Agniparthi Sudeep Vs The State of Telangana

Patolla Kasinath Rao Vs State of Telangana

Kommireddy Shailendra Vs The State of Telangana

Gajula Rama Rao Vs The State of Telangana

Kompally Ravindar Vs The State of Telangana

Molla Shivaiah @ Shiva Kumar Vs The State of Telangana