The High Court disposed of a Section 482 Cr.P.C. petition seeking quashing of an FIR for Section 379 IPC. Without going into merits, the Court directed the petitioners to appear before the IO for compliance with Section 41-A Cr.P.C. and Arnesh Kumar guidelines.
Petition disposed of by directing appearance before IO for Section 41-A Cr.P.C. compliance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3219 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
WEDNESDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI
CRIMIN PETITION NO: 1 OF 2024
Between:
AND
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash in FIR No. 23512023 on the file of the P.S Chiryal, Nalgonda District.
l.A. NO: 2OF 2024
Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings ifl FIR No 23512023 on the file of the P.S Chiryal,Nalgonda District.
This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing ttp Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri RAJAmPALLAVAN TAYI, Advocale for the Petitioners and the Asst. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Respondent No.2 is not appears in personal or by Advocate.
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI
CRIMINAL PETITION No.l of2024
ORDER:
\
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos. I and 2 in FIR, seeking to quash the proceedings against them in F.I.R.No.235 of 2023 on the file of Chityal police Station, Nalgonda, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Section 379 tPC.
procedure laid down under Section 4l-A Cr.p.C. and also the guidelines I formulated by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in Arnesh Kumar u t
TMD,J Crl.P. o.1of 2024
2
,/
State of BiharI scrupulously. However, the petitioners shall co-operate with
the Investigating Ofhcer as and when requircd by fumishing inforrnation
and the petitioners shall produce alI relevant documents/material required for the purpose of the investigation and the Investigating Oflicer shall consider
the same before filing appropriate report before the Magistrate.
Miscel la neous app I icar ions, i f any pending, q! q!, ",r$riL1rti,.,:lio,
ASSISTANT EGI
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
BJLB
' lzora;a scc zz:
HIGH COURT
DATED:03/01/2024
ORDER
1 € STAr€ o
f, c>
o 2 2 JAN ?$2[ j!
(-)
i,
*
(! rJi{
CRLP.No.1 ot 2024
CRIMINAL PET]TION IS DISPOSED OF
vv<br>14
)2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the criminal petition seeking quashing of FIR under Section 482 Cr.P.C. deserves to be allowed?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Arnesh Kumar v State of BiharReferred¶31
Arnesh Kumar v State of Bihar
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Ravula Srisrilam
Rabula Beerappa
The State of Telangana
Achena Yadaiah
T.MADHAVI DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
