that only on the ground that the petitioner was a partner of the FrrmM/s. Rohit & Associates, which had obtained loan from A. l-Bank, a criminal case has been registered in respect of certain transactions of A. l-Bank with the firm-M/s. Rohit & Associates that took place during 1997 aad 1998. It is further submitted that A.55, the father of the petitioner, was the Managing Director of M/s. Rohit & Associates and it was, therefore, his father who had pledged the documents with the A. l-Bank arld merely because the father of the petitioner had obtained the loan, the petitioner cannot be made as an accused in the criminal case. The learned Senior Counsel further submitted that all the facts in respect of the very same loan tra-nsaction has also been investigated as part of Crime No. 5 of 2OO2 which was taken cognizance in C.C. No 458 of 2005 for the offences under Sections 120-8, 4O9, 42O IPC and Section 5 of A.P. Protection of Depositors Financial Establishments Act, 1999 in which the petitioner was arrayed as A,3 and that when tlle said proceedings were challenged before this Court by hling a quash petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., this Court has considered all the above facts and has quashed the proceedings against the petitioner herein. The learned Senior Counsel has also placed on record a copy of the orders of this Court dated 09.11.2023 in Crl.P. No. 9156 of 2OO9.
