Disposed

Arra Ramulamma v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC3 Jan 2024CRLP/12888/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Accused Nos.2 and 3 in a dowry harassment and hurt case sought quash of proceedings; relief was limited to dispensing with their appearance before the trial court until required for any specific purpose.

What did the court decide?

Appearance of petitioners dispensed with before the trial court until required for any specific purpose; order auto-vacates if they fail to appear as directed.

Arra Ramulamma Vs The State of Telangana — Dowry and Cruelty | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^321s]

¶2

IN THE HIGH^{COURTFORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, '^{_TWOTHETHIRD DAY OF JANUARY} THOUSAND^{ANDTWENTY FOUR}

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^{SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVIDEVI}

¶6

c IMINAL^PETITI N O:1 oF2 23

¶7

""T"il;,^{Ramulamma,w/o Anianeyulu'Age50' occ Household' R/oH No'2-19'}

¶8

S.B. Pally,^{Kothur Mandal, RR District}

¶9

1. Arra An.ianeyulu,^{S/o e'il"i' Ag" s8' OccAgriculture'RJo H'No 2-19' S'B'} Pally, Kothur^{Mandal, RR District} ...petitioner/Aciused^{No.2 & 3}

¶10

AND

¶11

The State^{of Telangana,repBy its Public prosecutor' High Courtof}

¶12

Telangana,^HYderabad'

¶13

Telangana,^HYderabad'

¶14

1. Ravula^{Mounika@Yerra Mounika'D/oRavula Chandramouly'Age' 32 yrs'} Occ. Teaching,^{ru" n Nt Z-Oe'Uain RoaA'Valigonda' NalgondaDistricl} 508112.

¶15

petirion under section 482 or cr'P'c ,'"^'^{;::T":""T:ffi:::::} stated in the^{Memorandu. oicrornJ.of criminal-Petition, the High courtmay be} oleased^{to quashtne proceJaingiin icNo'sr+3ot 2023 on the file of the learned} LB Nagar^{for the section4984'323 of IPC} Uiiii,tii,""'irtlLtropoiit"n^rti'giJti't" 't ;;;'.;;. tr;J^{4 of DP a"t"g"inttthe Petitioners/Accusedno 2 and 3 in the} interest of iustice.

¶16

l.A NO:2^{oF 2023}

¶17

Petition under^{section 482 of cr.P.cpraying that in thecircumstances} .trteo in in"^{Memorandumof Groundsof criminal Petition, the High court may be} pi.rt"j t" ttrv of all furthei^{proceedings in C-C.No 5143 of 2023 On the file of the} i...J vr ndil.^{Metropotitari uagistraieat LB Nagar includingappearanceof the} ' petitioner/Accused no.2,3 in the interest^of iustice'

¶18

This Petition^{coming on for hearing'upon perusingthe Memorandumof} Grounds of Criminal^{Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M Amarnath'} Advocate for^{the Petitioner andthe Public Prosecutoron behalf of the Respondent} No. and none^{appeared for the Respondent No 2'}

¶19

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

I \

I I

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI^DEVI

¶24

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 12888^{of 2023}

¶25

ORDER:

¶26

This Criminal Petition is filed under^{Section 482 of the Code of} Criminal Procedure, 1973^(for short^{'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioners,who} are arrayed as accused Nos.2 and 3,^{seeking quash of the proceedings} against them in C.C.No.5143 of^{2023on the f,rle of the Courtof VI} Additional Metropolitan Magistrate at^L.B.Nagar.

¶27

At the time of hearing, leamed counsel for^{the petitioners} submitted that the^petitioners are^{limiting the relief only to the extent of} dispensing with their appearance^before the^{trial Court until their} appearance is required for any specific^purpose.

¶28

Leamed Assistant Public Prosecutor^{for respondentNo.1} -^State is also heard.

¶29

In view of the limited relief sought^{for, this Criminal Petition is} disposed of with a direction that^{the appearanceof the petitionersis} dispensed with before the trial Court^{untiltheir presenceis requiredfor any} specific purpose and if they do^not appear^{as and when required by the trial} Court, this order gets automatically^vacated

¶30

¶31

TMD,J crl.P.No.1288E of 2023

¶32

.( Accordingty, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

¶33

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand

¶34

closed.

¶35

SD/. MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSIST ANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE^COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Vl Additional^{Metropolitan nlagistrate at LB Nag^ar} i. in" St"it"^{Houseofficer,MeerpetPolice Station'Racahkonda} ;. +;; aE;^{t; the Public Prosecutoi,Highcourtfor the State of relansanaat} Hyderabad [OUT]

¶40

a Oi e CC to Sri^{M Amarnath, Advocate [OPUC]}

¶41

Two CD^CoPies

ADI(AK

\ \

HIGH COURT

DATED:0310112024

ORDER

CRLP.No.12888 ot 2023

¶50

lHE S14 14:
t
,
\q
E
?
5o(, 27 ilfr\ Wr
{'-
ft

¶51

DISPOSING OF THE CRLP

¶52

@ 611ll,x \5\3h'

Arra Ramulamma v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arra Ramulamma v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Vajra Kumar Reddy Vs The State of Telangana and 4 Others

Gaddam Vivek Vs Damodhar Reddy

Mohd. Abdul Samad Vs The State of Telangana

Ravula Srisailam Vs The State of Telangana

Jagadam Venkanna Vs The State of Telangana

Sri. M. Rohit Reddy Vs State of Telangana