Allowed

V. Radhakrishna v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC21 Feb 2024CRLP/1856/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for offences under Sections 403, 409, and 420 IPC, the court allowed anticipatory bail considering the accused had already deposited significant dues and was issued notices by authorities, deeming the case one of verification.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Petition allowed; petitioner released on anticipatory bail subject to surrender within 15 days and execution of a personal bond with sureties.

V. Radhakrishna Vs The State of Telangana — Money Laundering | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CRIMINAL PETITION No.1856 OF 2024

¶2

O R D E R:

¶3

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C”) seeking anticipatory bail to the petitioner/Accused in Crime No.237 of 2019 on the file of Station House Officer, Thangallapalli Police Station, Rajanna Siricilla District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 403, 409 and 420 of Indian Penal Code.

¶4

The case of the prosecution in brief was that on 27.11.2019 at about 15:10 hours, the Administrative Officer of 17^th Battalion, TSSP Office, Thaddur, lodged a report before the Police stating that “Sri Venkateswara Consultancy Services” had provided the services of outsourcing employees to the Battalion from November 2014 to August 2016. It failed to pay the amounts under EPF, ESI and Service Tax, totaling Rs.49,61,175/-, and misappropriated and cheated the Government by failing to deposit in the individual accounts of the outsourcing employees. Basing on the said report, the above Crime was registered.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner-Accused and learned

¶6

¶7

Dr.GRR,J Crl.P. No.1856 of 2024

¶8

Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent-State.

¶9

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had already deposited a sum of Rs.27,54,550/- to the Employees Provident Fund pursuant to the proceedings initiated by the Regional Provident Fund Commissionerate, Hyderabad. The issue was one of verification and reconciliation of accounts. The petitioner never received any notice from the Battalion intimating about the alleged dues of the Employees Provident Fund and prayed to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail.

¶10

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner-accused stating that the offence under Section 409 of Indian Penal Code was also invoked against the petitioner, as such, he was not entitled for anticipatory bail.

¶11

Perused the record. Considering that the crime is of the year 2019 and the petitioner was also issued notices by the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Hyderabad and he also paid certain amounts which were due, it is considered fit to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.237 of 2019 on the file of Station House Officer, Thangallapalli Police Station on

¶12

¶13

Dr.GRR,J Crl.P. No.1856 of 2024

¶14

certain conditions.

¶15

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioner-

¶16

accused shall be released on anticipatory bail subject to the following conditions:

¶17

1. The petitioner/accused is directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Thangallapalli Police Station, Rajanna Siricilla District, within a period of 15 days from the date of this order. On such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release the petitioner/accused on bail, on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/(Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the said Station House Officer.

¶18

1. The petitioner/accused shall abide by the conditions stipulated under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C and shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer in investigation of the case.

¶19

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

¶20

______________________ Dr. G.RADHA RANI, J

¶21

Date: 21.02.2024 ds/dsv

¶22

¶23

Dr.GRR,J Crl.P. No.1856 of 2024

¶24

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶25

CRIMINAL PETITION No.1856 OF 2024 Date: 21.02.2024

¶26

ds/dsv

V. Radhakrishna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

V. Radhakrishna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumarapu Somashekar @ Sudheer Vs The State of Telangana

Shaik Waheed Vs The State of Telangana

Md Hameed Khan Vs State of Telangana

Dadi Jagadesh Vs The State of Telangana

Guvva Srikanth Vs the State of Telangana

Gunty Chetan Sagar Vs The State of Telangana