Dismissed

Guvva Srikanth v. the State of Telangana

Telangana HC21 Feb 2024CRLP/1487/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana considered a criminal petition seeking anticipatory bail under Section 439 CrPC. Counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw the petition, which was granted, resulting in the dismissal of the matter as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the Criminal Petition was accorded and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn pending miscellaneous complaints were closed.

Guvva Srikanth Vs the State of Telangana — Anticipatory Bail | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[³²¹⁵ ]

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI

¶6

CRIMINAL PETITION No: 1487 of 2024

¶7

Between:

¶8

GUWA SRIKANTH, S/o. Jaya Ramulu, Age: 25 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Eailampur village Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet District.

¶9

GUWA RAVI, S/o. Balnarsaiah, Age:28 years, Occ: Agriculture, Ri/o. Baiiampur village Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet District.

¶10

NEERUDI MADHU, S/o. Mallesham, Age: 27 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Bailampur village Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet District.

¶11

NEERUDI SWAMY, S/o. Narsimlu, Age: 33 years, Occ: Agriculture, R./o. Bailampur village Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet District.

¶12

NEERUDI MAHESH @ MAHENDER, S/o. Anjaiah, Age: 30 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Bailampur village Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet District.

¶13

THALARI MAHESH @ MAHIPAL, S/o. Ramulu, Age: 28 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Baipmpur village Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet District.

¶14

i;i

¶15

SHERIPALLY SRINU @ BEDIRAMAINA SRINU, S/o. Lakshmaiah, Age: 28 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Bailampur village, Mulugu Mandal, Skldipet District.

¶16

PARUPULA KARUNAKAR, S/o. Narsaiah, Age: 36 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o. Bailampur village Mulugu Mandal, Siddipet District.

¶17

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED Nos.1 to 5, 7,9 & 10

¶18

AND

¶19

THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, At Hyderabad.

¶20

t1:

¶21

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶22

Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to ENLARGE the Petitioner/Accused Nos. 1 to 5, 7, I & 10 on Anticipatory Bail in the event of arrest in connection with Crime No. 20 of 2024 ol P. S. Mulugu, Siddipet District under Section 307 Rl/W 34 of lPC.

¶23

¶24

¶25

This Petition coming on for^{hearing,upon perusingthe Memorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition^{andupon hearingthe argumentsof sri S SWARNA} REDDY,AdvocateforthePetitionefsandthePublicProsecutoronbehalfofthe Sole Respondent.

¶26

The Court made^{the following:ORDER}

r 1r'. .

NUL/AN A2

THE HONOUIIABI,E,^{DR..IUSTICEG.RADHARANI}

¶31

CRIMINAL^P ETITION^{No.l4E 7 0F 2024}

¶32

ORDER:

¶33

This Criminal^{Petition is filedunder Section439 of Codeof} crinrinal Procedure,^{1973 (tbr short"cr.P.C")seckinganticipatorybail} to the petitioners/Accused^{Nos. I to 5, 7,9 and l0 in Crime No'20of} 2024 on the file^{of StationHouseOfticer, Mulugu Police Station'} Siddipet District,,^{registered for the oflence punishable underSection} 307 r/w 34 ollndian^{Penal Code.}

¶34

After arguing lor^{somc tirne,learned counsel lorthe} pctitioners/Accused^{Nos. I to 5,7} '^{9 and t0, sought permission of this} Court to^{withdrawthe present Criminal Petition}

¶35

Permission is^accorded.

¶36

4 Accordingty,^{this Criminal Petition is disrrissed as withdrawn'}

¶37

Miscellaneous^{petitions, if any, p:nding'shall stand clgse-{'} so/-^{N. S} RI ASSISTANT^REGIS //TRUE^COPY// SECTION^OFFICER ffi

¶38

To,

¶39

1 23 i[:iH$f^{f,di{;i3F;$l}}Yftiii'^'"#i$g?i:"'"+'s:nsanaa'i} 4 B,"l"tt?S^{S?YII r*o**o *.DDY'AdvocatetoPUCl} 5 Two^{CD CoPies}

¶40

I,l

¶41

KUL/AK s

HIGH COURT

ffi

DATED:21 10212024

.-t\la'

ORDER

CRLP.No.1487 ot 2024

THIS CRIMINAL PETITION !S
DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN
4
@Gt'
M
a6

¶49

1 g,E STAr5
ffi
,q +)
oo 26 tiB I[2{ ),r)
$
{-
t + ,t
Di.,Jlt.3i,
ffi
ffi

¶50

':i#*,,iI

Guvva Srikanth v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Guvva Srikanth v. the State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kumarapu Somashekar @ Sudheer Vs The State of Telangana

Shaik Waheed Vs The State of Telangana

Md Hameed Khan Vs State of Telangana

Dadi Jagadesh Vs The State of Telangana

V. Radhakrishna Vs The State of Telangana

Gunty Chetan Sagar Vs The State of Telangana