Allowed

Ganta Polli Reddy v. Madhuvani Kakarla

Telangana HC4 Jan 2024CRLP/12467/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed petitions to record compromise and compound an offence under Section 498-A of BNS. The criminal proceedings were quashed subject to the petitioner paying a total sum of Rs.10,000 to specified institutions within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Quashed proceedings in CC No.334 of 2023 directed payment of Rs.10,000 to Director Sainik Welfare and Telangana High Court Advocates Association.

Ganta Polli Reddy Vs Madhuvani Kakarla — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

1321s l

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry FOUR

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

¶6

lA. Nos. 3 and4 of 2023 IN/AND CRIMIN AL PETITIO N NO: 1246 7 0F 2023

¶7

Between:

¶8

Ganta Polli Reddv. S/o poti Reddy, Aged.3.l years, Occ. private Employee. Ri,/o Piddugupatti Viilage, Katasapadu,ilunEuI xrojii'dirin"r. Andhra pradesh

¶9

AND

¶10

...PETITIONERTACC USED

¶11

1 Madhuvani Kakarla, D/o Kakarla Madhuvani, Aged 26 years, Occ. private Emptoyee, Rl/o Door No.2t2O, Ba@;"; p;lii,'HIIri}"r, Katasapadu, cuddapa h, And hra prad esh. ... REs co il dE'r.r iltsHr"ec ro coM pLAr NANr

¶12

2 The State of Telanoana. Rep., by public prosecutor, High Cou( at Hyderabad.

¶13

...RESPONDENT

¶14

Petition under Section ^4g2^{0f cr.p.cpraying that in the circumstances} stated in the Memorandum of Grounds or ciirilrr'p"tition, the High cou,- may be pleased to quash the proceedings against *,e p"iii,orerlAccused in cc No.334 0f 2023 0n the fire of the rX Additiinrr"r\r;il;;tr; rvragrstrate, at Kukatpary in view of the consent terms agreed upon by th; il;;;;.^"'

¶15

t.A. NO:30 F 2023

¶16

Petition under section 320(6) of cr.p.c praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds oicri,,inli?_"tition, the High court may be pleased to permit the oetitioner/r""*"0 l"i"ilt'nu.pondent to compound the offence in cc No.334 oi zozl, on *,e iire oJ it" rion,or" rX Additionar Metroporitan at Kukarpa'y, ror *re orencJ. prriri,r"oi" under section 498- A of the f[Ssistrate'

¶17

l.A. NO: 4 OF 2023

¶18

Between:

¶19

Madhuvani Kakarla, D/o Kakarla^{Madhuvani,Aged 26 years,} Occ. Private Employee, R/o Door No.2/20, Brahmana^{Palli, Rajupalem,} Kalasapadu, Cuddapah, Andhra Pradesh.

¶20

...PETITIONERYACCUSED No.¹

¶21

AND

¶22

't. Ganta Polli Reddy, S/o Poli Reddy, Aged.31 years, Occ. Private Employee. Rl,/o. Piddugupalli Village, Kalasapadu^{mandal,(Cdqpq} Q!ltlS!.4t9_tla Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶23

1. The Slate of Telangana,^{Rep., by PublicProsecutor, High Court at} Hyderabad. .'.RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶24

Petition under Section 320(2) ot Cr.P.C^{praying that in the circumstances} stated in the [\rlemorandum of Grounds^{of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be} pleased to record the compromise between the complainant^{and the Petitioner} Accused in CC No.334 of 2023, on the^{of the lX Additional Metropolitan} Magistrate, at Kukatpally, in terms of^{lvlOUdt.15.012023.}

¶25

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon^perusing the^{Memorandum of} Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the^{arguments of Sri S. Nagesh} Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on^behalf of^the Respondent No. 2 and of Smt. Karri Gayatri, Advocate^{for the Respondent No.1.}

¶26

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶27

-I-ITE HON'BLI' SMT. JUSTTCE T.MADIIAVI DEVI

¶28

I.A.No s.3 and 4 of 2023 inland CRIMINAL PETITION No.l 2467 ot 2023

¶29

COMM oNo RDER:

¶30

It is submitted by leamed counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent No. l, that during pendency of the present Criminal petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos. 3 and 4 of 2023 have been filed to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

¶31

Vide order dated 19.12.2023, this Courr directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Cornmittee, High Court for the State of Telangana,Hyderabad, for identification and to subrnit a report.

¶32

Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parlies have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legat Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a reporl, dated 28.12.2023 and the same is placed on record.

¶33

L216i or 20./l ffi

¶34

Lrit'\o

¶35

Itr vierv o[' l-he^{above,, l.A.Nos.3and 4 of 2023 are} allorved. Cortsequer-rtly,^{this CrirninalPetition is allowedand} the proceedings in^{C.C.No.334 of 2023 on the file of the IX} Additionat Mctropolitan^{Magistrate,at Kukatpallyagainstthe} petitioner is hereby^{quashedsubject to paying an amount of} Rs.5,0001 (Rupces Five^{Thousand Only) to the Director,} Sainik Wellare, Hydetabad^{(SavingsA/c.No.52188926279,} State Bank ol India,^{Shantinagar Branch(20010),IFSCCode} :SB1N0020070, MICR^{No.500004057) and Rs'5,000i-} (Rupees Fivc Thousand Only) to the^{TelanganaHigh Courl} Advocates Association, Hyderabad,^{within a period of two} (02) weeks lr-on.r toclay and file proof of the^{same beforethe} Registry.

¶36

Misccllaneous applications, if any^{pending, shallstand}

¶37

closed.

¶38

sd/^{- A.v.s. PRASAD} ASSISTA^{NT REGIS}

¶39

,/TRUE^coPY// SECTIoN^oFFlcER

¶40

To,

¶41

1H;[$rffiTtfi.irltry1;#: : H'#l:^{::.x;'lSijLl i5J:'5 35J31}

¶42

Two CD Copies

¶43

¶44

Note: Totar Amount of Rs. 10,000r ( Rupees Ten thousand onry ) has been paid by sri s. Nagesh Reddy, counser for the petitioner as directed by the Hon,bre court vide order dated 04.01-2024 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand onry ) to the "Director, Sainik werfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,o0oi- ( Rupees Five thousand onry ) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and fired l\rlemo as proof of compliance USR No 50613 of 2024 dated 12-06-2024 YY

HIGH COURT

DATEO:O410112024

ORDER

o? 1e L4
'7
I &^
: .v
::]
\- .(,
,:) .:, il
s<br>, i,1
) ,:i 0lli*

¶50

<br>

¶51

lA. Nos. 3 and 4 ot 2023 IN/AND

¶52

CRIMINAL PETITION NO:^{12467OF 2023}

¶53

I.A. NOS. 3 AND 4 OF 2023 ARE ALLOWED AND CRIMlNAL PETITION IS ALLOWED

¶54

ccP(a) to#"

Ganta Polli Reddy v. Madhuvani Kakarla

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganta Polli Reddy v. Madhuvani Kakarla

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravula Srisailam Vs The State of Telangana

Jagadam Venkanna Vs The State of Telangana

Arra Ramulamma Vs The State of Telangana

Smt. Ramadas Pally Madhuri Vs The State of Telangana

Katikam Srinivas Goud Vs The State of Telangana

Vemula Rajesh Vs The State of Telangana