Allowed

Syed Ahamed v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC14 Feb 2024CRLP/1168/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Accused Nos.1 and 2 sought quashing of SC/ST (POA) Act case proceedings after compromising with the complainant. The court allowed I.A.Nos.2 and 3 to record the compromise and compound the offences, quashed the proceedings, subject to payment of Rs.10,000 to two welfare funds.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings in Spl.S.C.No.179 of 2022 against accused Nos.1 and 2 quashed, subject to payment of Rs.10,000 to two funds within two weeks; I.A.Nos.2 and 3 allowed.

Syed Ahamed Vs The State of Telangana — Caste Atrocities | Telangana HC (2024)

¶1

[^338s ]

¶2

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶4

WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶7

l.A.Nos.2 AND 3 OF 2024

¶8

IN/AND

¶9

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1168 OF 2024

¶10

Between:

¶11

Syed Ahamed, S/o. Syed Hasan, Aged about 61 years, Occ. Driver, Rl/o. H.No. C-767, lnumulnarva Village,Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶12

Syed Gayas Pasha, S/o. Syed Ahmmed, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Pvt.Employee, Rt/o. H.No. C-767, lnumulnarva Village,Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶13

...Petitioners/Accused No. 1 and 2

¶14

AND

¶15

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad, Through SHO, P.S. Keshampet.

¶16

M. Narsimha, S/o. Narsimha, Aged about 54 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rt/o. H.No.5-104, Sangem Village, Keshampet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

¶17

...Respondents/Complainant

¶18

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to Quash the proceedings in Spl.SC.No. 179 ot 2022 on the file of the Court of the Special Judge for SC and ST(POA), Act Cases Cum- Additional Metropolitan Session Judge, R.R. District, At L.B. Nagar, against the Petitioners/ Accused No.1 and 2.

¶19

l.A. NO: 1OF 2024

¶20

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in Spl.SC.No. 179 of 2022 on the file of in the Court of the Special Judge for SC and ST(POA), Act Cases Cum- Addl. Metropolitan Session Judge, R. R. District, at LB. Nagar, against the Petitioners/ Accused No. 1 and 2.

¶21

l.A. NOs: 2 &3 oF 2024

¶22

Between

¶23

M. Narsimha. S/o. Narsimha,,Aged about 54 years, Occ Agriculture, fuo

¶24

H No.5-104, Sansem Viilase, Kesiamp"i lr,i"n jri,"ilrlgX"Fieooy District.

¶25

AND

¶26

...Petitioner/2nd Respondent

¶27

1 . The State of Telan qqlg, 39p by its public prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad, Through SHO, P.S. Keshampet.

¶28

...Respondent/Complainant

¶29

Syed Ahamed, S/o. Sved H.?.san, Aged about 61 years, Occ. Driver, R/o H.No. C-767, tnumutnirva Viilage,Ko-th;rl;r"l"r, {rib" Reddy Disrrict.

¶30

Syed Gayas pasha. S/o. Sye_d^Ahmmed, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Pvt.Emptoyee, R/o. H.No 6_zoz, inumiinl,il"riiiiJg",xothur Mandat, Ranga Reddy Diskict.

¶31

..Respondents/petitioners/Accused No. 1 & 2

¶32

Petition under Section 320(6) R/w. Section 482 of Cr.p .C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memoranoum oi ciornos of criminar petition, 9".^{H'g! Court maybe ptealgg} Io "orpo r nJ tn" ofiJn"" under secrions 323, l9j:^11^{.t_1:9,^q":3(.1lfXS)sc'sFoA n"i zors and} euash rhe procee.rngs in spt s.c.No.1r.9 of 2022 on the fite or irre court "l tn"Gp""irr Judge for SC and ST(pOA). Act Cases Cur nOJi. [ietiopotitan Session Judge, R.R. Districr, at L.B. Nagar, in the interesi "i tn"ir.iiiL.'

¶33

l.A. NO: 3 OF 2024

¶34

Petition under Section 320(2) r/vv. Section 482 of Cr.p.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memoranaum oi Grlunos of criminar petition, the. High court may be pteased to r""ord tre comp-ro-mise in crr.p.No. of 2024 and.Quash the proceedings in spr.s.c.No .ris-it [oi)' on the fire of in the court of the Speciat Judge for S_C and ST('OA), nli- C"r", Cum_ Additionat justice.Me.tropolitan session Judge, R. R. Distri"t,' "i r-lb. N"g"r in the interest of the

¶35

Grounds - This Petition of Criminal coming petition and on for upon hearing the arguments hearing, upon perusing the of Sri Memorandum ofCh. Venkat Reddy, Advocate for the petitioners and the AssisLnt pubric prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 and of Sri Venkateshwarlu Dasari, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2

¶36

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

¶37

I I

¶38

I I

¶39

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA

¶40

I.A.Nos.2 and.3 of 2o24

¶41

ln and CRIMINAL PETITION No.1168 of 2024

¶42

COMMON ORDER:

¶43

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing for the pelitioners as well as the respondent No.2, that during pendency of the present Criminal Petition, the parties have compromised the matter and accordingly, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 have been frled to record the compromise between them and to compound the offences.

¶44

Vide order dated O1.02.2024, this Court directed the parties along with their respective counsel to appear before the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad, for identification and to submit a report.

¶45

Pursuant to the above said direction issued by this Court, the parties have appeared and the Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee, has identified the parties and submitted a report, dated 09.O2.2024 and the same is placed on record.

¶46

In view of the above, I.A.Nos.2 and 3 of 2024 are allowed. Consequently, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in Spl.S.C.No.l79 of 2022 on the file of the Special Judge for SC & ST (POA) Act Cases-cum-Additional

¶47

¶48

¶49

2 SKS, J Crl.P.No 1168 oI2024

¶50

Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B. Nagar against the petitioners/ accused Nos.1 and 2 are hereby quashed subject to the petitioners paying al amount of Rs'5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the Director, sainik welfare, Hyderabad (Savings A/c.No.52188 9262z9, State Bank of India, Shantinagar Branch (2OOTO), IFSC Code:SBIN0O2OO7O, MICR No.500OO4OST) and Rs.5,0O0/_ (Rupees Five Thousand only) to the Telangana High court Advocates Association, Hyderabad, within a period of two (02) weeks from today and file proof of the same before the Registry.

¶51

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

The Special Judge for SC and ST^(POA), Act Cases Cum- Additional Irrletropolitan Session Judge, R.R.District, at L.B. Nagar.

¶56

The Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Shadnagar.

¶57

The Station House Officer, Keshampet Police Station, Cyberabad.

¶58

Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT)

¶59

One CC to Sri Ch. Venkat Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

¶60

One CC to Sri Venkateshwarlu Dasari, Advocate [OPUC]

¶61

Two CD Gopies

¶62

(ALONG WITH A COPY OF JOINT IVIEMO OF COMPROMISE)

¶63

Note: Total Amount of Rs. 10,0001 ( Rupees Ten thousand only )^has been^paid by Sri Ch. Venkat Reddy, Counsel for the Petitioners as directed by the Hon'ble Court vide order daled 14.02.2024 as Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the "Director, Sainik Welfare Hyderabad, and Rs. 5,000/- ( Rupees Five thousand only ) to the Telangana High Court Advocates Association, Hyderabad and filed Memo as proof of compliance USR No. 212'1 I of 2024 daled 28.O2.2024.

¶64

NJB/kam

¶65

¶66

HIGH COURT DATED:1410212024

¶67

COMMON^ORDER

¶68

l.A.Nos. 2 &3^{of 2024} ln/and CRLP.No.1168^o12024

¶69

I S 1/{16: o
v
:) rl
o
,..1
2g ilAB ?u4 i
.t,,/
t o
OL-:SPAiC
-:=t-

¶70

ALLOWING^{THE I.A'S} & CRIMINAL^PETITION

¶71

¶72

¶73

MEMORANDUM O F CRIMINAL MISC.^PETITION (Under Section 32O (6) Ww- Sec.482 of^{CriminalProcedure Code)} IN THE HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TEHNGANA:^{AT HYDERABAD} CRL.P.No. | 1t- P^{or zozl7} 'lN I SPL 5.C.No. 179 0F 2022

¶74

(on the file of in the courr of the Special Judge^{for sc & ST(POA), Act Cases cum-} Addl. Metropolitan^{Session Judge'R. R. District'At L'B' Nagar')}

¶75

Between:

¶76

l.Syed Ahamed, 5/o.^{SYed Hasan'} Aged about 61^years, Occ:^Driver, R/o. H.No. C-767,^{lnumulnarva Village'} Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy^District.

¶77

Syed 6ayas^Pasha, 5/o.^SyedAhmmed, Aged about 32^years, Occ:^{Pvt.Employee,} R./o. H.No. C-767, lnumulnarva^Village' Kothur Mandal, Ranga Reddy^District-

¶78

.... Petitioners/Accused^{No. 1 and 2}

¶79

AND

¶80

The State of Telangana, Rep.by iti Public Prosecutor, High Court. Hyderabad,

¶81

Through SHO,^{P.5. KeshamPet.}

¶82

M. Narsimha, 5/o.^Narsimha,

¶83

Aged about:54^years, Occ:Agriculture'

¶84

Vo. H.No.5-104,^{SangemVillage'} Keshampet Mandal,^{RangaReddy District.} ..... Respondents/ComPlainant

¶85

JOINT MEMO

¶86

It is submitted that the Petitioners and 2"d respondent/defacto complainant have
amicably settled the dispute at the intervention of elders and well-wishers and the
matter has been compromised between them. Hence the both parties came to
compromise in the above said Spl.SC.No. 179 of 2O22on the file of in the Court of the
Special Judge for 5C & ST(POA), Act Cases Cum- Addl. MetroPolitan Session Judge, R.
R. District, At L.B. Nagar,, and the parties of have no claims or rights against each other
nthef
L.<br>.rl, Lr^9
2"d M, -I,,k*)-. 1.7u
C^N'ryetitio .l and 2
coun5e Co petitioners
or 2'd ResPon bent /
U^N

Syed Ahamed v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Syed Ahamed v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahadeva Kameswara Rao Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Ahmeds Construction Equipments, Vs The State of Telangana

M/s. Ahmeds Construction Equipments Vs The State of Telangana

Gudem Vikram Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Guntupalli Padmaja Vs The State of Telangana

Kandula Karunakar Vs The State of Telangana