In a Contempt Case filed under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 regarding the promotion of a retired petitioner, the Court held that since no junior of the petitioner was promoted, there was no contempt committed by the respondents, and accordingly closed the case.
Contempt Case closed against the respondents with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
126971
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
CONTEMPT-CASE NO: 439OF 2020
Contempt Case filed under Section 'l0lo 12 of Contempt of CourtsAct,'1971 to punish the Respondents herein for willful violation of the orders of this Court dated 06.12.20'19 passed in W.P.No.27074 ot 2019.
Between:
S Chandra Gopal, Occ Superintendent Engineer, MEPMA, Public Helath Department, Hyderabad, T-S,
...Petitioner
AND
... Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri C Srinivasa Baba
Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Services lll
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
coNTEMirT CASE No.439 0F 2020
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Pleader for Services appearing for the respondents has informed the Court that the petitioner has retired from service and that none of the juniors to the petitioner were promoted and hence, there is no contempt on the part of the respondents.
Miscellaneor.rs Applications, if any, pending in this Contempt
Case, shall stand closed.
/* *..".."3.rrr., sd/- t. sntruvns DEPUTY RqGISTRAR
/TTRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
K hY-
HIGH COURT
DATED:0811112024
ORDER
lAlc
ttt
rt
a.
1\t I
t-
.L
\t \N I
oo
+tl Esf N<br>
CC.No.439 of 2020
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS
G*s"[
vr^
l,<br>ap
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents committed contempt for not promoting the junior of the petitioner.
Whether the court should file a Contempt Closure Order in absence of violating the court order.
S Chandra Gopal
Sri Aravind Kumar IAS
Sri R Sreedhar
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
