Writ petition filed directing the Revenue Department to dispose of a survey appeal within eight weeks per Supreme Court directions. The higher court disposed of the writ at the admission stage, issuing the same directive to the 2nd respondent.
Direction to 2nd respondent to dispose of appeal Rc. No. 1/2807/05 within 8 weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31681
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO: 9613 oF 2023
Between:
Both are represented by their G. P. A. Holder, Sri B. Venu Gopal Reddy, S/o. Late B. Lakshmana Reddy, aged about 58 years, Occ: Service, #802'Astral Heights, D.No.6-3-352/2&3, Road No.1, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500034.
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No. 2 herein, in not hearing and disposing of the appeal vide Rc. No. 1/2807105, despite the direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court dated 22. 11.2017 in C. A. No. 2255 of 2009 and C. A. No.225412009, to dispose the same with eight (8) weeks thereof, and oral and written representations including memos of the petitioner dated 27- 12- 2017 and O9-O7 -2018, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Principles of Natural Justice and Articles 14, 21 and 300- A of the Constitution of lndia, 1950 and consequently
direct the Resporrde nt No. t herern, to dispose of the said apperal within three weeks.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition uncer Section 15.1 CPC praying that in the circurnst;rnces stated in the affidavit filed in s rpport of the petition, the High Court may b: pleased to direct the first Respondent to fix the hearing in vide Rc. No. 1,'280710f;, ard comply with the orders of the Sut reme Court dated 22. 11. 2017 in C. A. No 2255 of 2009 and C. A. No. 2254l2OOg within two weeks thereafter, pendirrg the al)ov3 writ Petition.
Counsel for the Peti :ioners: SRI M.V.DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Res ,ondent Nos.1 TO 3: SRI J.AMRUTH RAO, ACiP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Res )ondent No.4: -
The Court at the adr tission stage made the following: ORDE R
I \
I
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE K.LAKSHMAN
' WRIT PETITION No.96l3 OF 2023
ORDER
Heard Sri M.V.Durga Prasad, leat'ned counsel for the petitioners and Sri J.Amruth Rao, leamed Asst.Govt.Pleader fbr revenue appearing for respondents I to 3. Perused the record.
I
I I 1 I i
Apex C,rrtr r rtlviclc colttltt()ttortlcrtlated ll lll()17 rr(','No.1255 ol 2009 arrr{ .'.A.No.ll5lol'l()09.thc Aller Court ijrtcrtocithe2''d rcspondcnt tr .lispose ofthe siriclappcal li-hin cight (8) rvceks. Despitc thcs riil orderand ott sttlrrritting t$o renrestl.tat ons bl the petitioncr. 2"' respondent is notdcciding the seid a1'p,:al 'lheleflore, the plescnt u' it petition.
Conseq ucntly, miscellaneous Petitions, rf any, rending, shatl also stand c lo ;ed.
SI]/.T,JAYASREE ASS,IS,TANTREGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// sEchuNoFFlcER
to ',. ,n" Principa Sectary, Revenue Dept ' Secretariat' Hyd:r;lbac' State of -, ffif3?il;\issionr:r,survey. seutemenr and Land Reco-d;,t- yderab{t. .. i'il:[#Helmvl:,,'mx?a'^:tii:"":mbt:,]bi":':'"T:':: 5. Two CCs:ofp ron iivtiiur.'n-ig-h'c;rrttorrtiest:'le of relangana, at 1-1u6s1653,1 [OUT]
O. Two CDC oJres
DE I'
HIGH COURT
DATED:1 11A4t2023
1 0 irli ?l?3
ORDER
WP.No.9613 cf 2023
DISPOSING OF THEWRIT PETITION AT THE ADl!IISSIONSTAGE WITHOUT C OSTS.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking direction to dispose of a survey appeal within eight weeks should be disposed of at the admission stage.
Whether the 2nd respondent must strictly adhere to Supreme Court directions while disposing of the pending appeal.
Khaja Naseeruddin
Khaja Nazleruddin
State of Telangana
Commissioner, Survey, Settlement and Land Records, Hyderabad
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
