The High Court dismissed two writ petitions, one under Article 226 and another under Section 151 CPC, as withdrawn by the petitioner, granting liberty to file a fresh petition.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to file a fresh petition; petitions dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3168 ]
H,cHcouRrr.*,J$"i"lt'1F.n3:,.,rt|':I3t}$ATHYDERABAD
N^ONDAYHE TENIHDAY OF APRIL_ rw'd "Hd u ser'r o p'u o TwENTYrH REE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRI JUSTICEK'LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION NO:25325 0F 2022
[#nei:',"g195['fl;"',iii,i;lB:":.x:[flf?..[?ij;3,i:#8ffi']",,,,.,...*
t/2//
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.6 and 7 not to demolish the existing structure in premises No. 23-1-710, admeasuring 75 Sq.Yards, situated at IMoghulpura, Charminar, Hyderabad in pursuance of letter of the respondent No.3, lA NO: 1 OF 2023
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to suspend the operation of orderspassed by this Hon'ble Courton 1610612022 in W.P.No.25325 o'f 2022.
Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl.VIJAY B. PAROPAKARI
Counsel for the RespondentNos.1to 3: GPFOR REVENUE
Counsel for the RespondentNo.4: NONEAPPEARED
Counsel for theRespondent Nos.s to 7: SRIPASHAMKRISHNA REDDY' SC FOR GHMC
The Courtmade the following:ORDER
/
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN
WRIT PETITION No.25325 OF 2022
ORAL ORDER:
Mr. Vijay B. Paropakari, learned counsel for the petitioner,
seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. He has also made an endorsement on the case bundle to that effect, apart from addressing a letter dated 10.04.2023 to the Registlar - I (Judicial).
Granting liberty, as sought, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pendir-rg
in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.
tL
SD/- P. CI,:I. NAGABHUSHAMBA 2 ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I
//TRUE COPY//
SECTIONTOFFICER
To,
HIGH COURT
DATED:1010412023
ORDER
W.P.No.25325 of 2022
-(HE STh ,e
o) ?
1 2 APR 20u3
*
O5 ,;o
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
(':)
_)/
<br>
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant liberty to withdraw and dismiss the writ petitions challenging demolition notices.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Writ Petitioner (unnamed)
State of Telangana
Tahsildar, Sanoorpuriya
Md Muntaz Ahmed Khan
Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
K. Lakshman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
