Dismissed

N.Awantika Devi v. The State of Telangana and 4 other

Telangana HC11 Apr 2023WP/9532/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana allowed the petitioner-counsel to withdraw three writ petitions. The writ petitions had been dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh writ petitions and all miscellaneous petitions pending in these writ petitions were closed.

What did the court decide?

Three writ petitions were dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh writ petitions; miscellaneous petitions stood closed.

N.Awantika Devi Vs The State of Telangana and 4 other — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³¹⁶⁸ I

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN

¶6

WRIT PETITION NOS: 9532, 10321 AND¹⁰³³¹ OF 2021

¶7

W.P.NO:95 320F 2021

¶8

Between:

¶9

N.Awantika Devi, W/o N Ramakrishna Chowdary, D/o^ThoutiRedd v Upendra Reddy, Aged 70^years, Occupation.^{Housewife,Rl/o. H.No.107,} Phase - l, Metro Palm Grove, Somajiguda, Hyderabad^{- 500082.}

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana,^{Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue} Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

The District Collector,^Warangal.

¶14

The Revenue Divrsional Officer,^{Kazipet lvlandal,WarangalUrban.}

¶15

The Mandal Revenue Officer,^{Kazipet Mandal,Warangal Urban District.}

¶16

The Tahsildar, Kazipet^{Mandal,Warangal Urban District.}

¶17

...RESPONDENTS

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution^{of lndia prayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the^{affidavitfiled therewith,the High Court maybe} pleased to issue a writ or order/s more^{pa(iculady one in the natureof Writ of} Mandamus for declaring the^{actionof the Respondent no.5in not initiatingany} action in consideration of the^{orders dated15-05-2019passed by Respondent} no.3 in File no NBg61t2O12^{rn respectof the land admeasuring Acres 6-25 guntas} situated at Madikonda^{Village of Khazipet Mandal,as being arbitrary, unjust, and} violation of article 14. 19. 21 and 300-4^{of constitution of lndia and consequently} direct the Respondent no.5 to conduct^{enquiry as per the orders} lrassed^{by the} Respondent no.3 in File no^{N896112012and pass final order'}

¶19

->.

¶20

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶21

Petition r:nc er Section 151 CPC^{prayingthat in the ci( tl'nstances stated in} the affidavit flled ir support of the^{petition,the High cotrrt rnal'be p eased to issue} interim directions lo the^{fifth respondentto fo(hwithcondu l: enrluiryandpass} necessary ordersⁱⁿ consideration^{of the ordersdatr:d'1 5'01-2019 passedby} Respondent no.3 ir File no^{N896112012,pending disposalof her W'it Petition'}

¶22

lA NO: 2 OF 2021

¶23

Between:

¶24

N.Awantik.a )evi, W/o^{N Ramakrishna Chowdary,D/c -lrotrti Fleddy Upendra} Reddy, Age I 70^years, Occupatron.^{Housewife-,^Rkr. ll ttlo'107, Phase - l,} Metro Palri-t irove, Somajiguda,^{Hyderabad500082.}

¶25

...PETITIOI{EFI/PETITIONER

¶26

AND

¶27

The Stat( of Telangana,^{Represented by rts Prirlcrp'allecrelary,Revenue} Departm( nt, SecreLariat,^Hyderabad.

¶28

The Distr ct Collector,^Warangal.

¶29

The Revt nue^{DivisionalOfficer, Kazipet hlanda . \'ar: rlr;al lJrban.}

¶30

The Manr al Revenue Officer,^{KazipetN4andal,Warantl:]lUriran Distrtct'}

¶31

The Tahs ldar, Kazipet^{lr,4andal.Warangal Urban D strrlt}

¶32

...RESPONDEN TS,/RE,SPONDENTS

¶33

Peddr R; Lmesh, S/o^{P.Vishwanatham,Aqe(l nlalor'Ri Ifvladikonda} Village, h azipet, Warangal Urban^Drstrlct

¶34

...RESPONDENT/PROPOSED^{F E:SPc)NDENTN0.6}

¶35

Pelition undr r Section 151 CPC^{prayrng that rn the ctr,:U I sta-rces stated in} the affidavit filecl ir support^{of the petition,the Hrgh 1lot]rl-'llily tre pleasedto} rmplead the respor JenUproposed^{respondent no 6 as rcspcn( erlt nf 6 rn WP No} 9532 ot 2021^.

¶36

Counsel for the Pe itioner:^{SRI N.KRISHNA SUMANTHFOR S'Rl VI'/EK JAIN} Counsel for the Re;pondents:^{GP FOR REVENUE}

¶37

-1

¶38

WRIT PETITION NO: 10321 OF 2021

¶39

Between:

¶40

N.Awantika Devi, W/o N.Ramakrishna Chowdary, D/o Thouti Redd v Upendra Reddy, Aged 70 years, Occupation. Housewife, RJo. H.No.107, Phase - l, Metro Palm Grove, Somajiguda, Hyderabad - 500082.

¶41

...PETITIONER

¶42

AND

¶43

1 . The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶44

The Distrlct Collector, Warangal-

¶45

The Revenue Drvisional Officer, Kazrpet Mandal, Warangal Urban.

¶46

The Tahsildar, Kazipet Mandal, Warangal Urban District.

¶47

Nama Madhavi, W/o N Dhruva Kumar, Occupation- Housewife, R/o Kumarpally Village, Kothur , Kazipet Mandal. Also at H.No,1-09-76311, 171, Julywada, Kazipet, Warangal Urban District, Telangana.

¶48

...RESPONDENTS

¶49

Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order/s more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus for declaring the action of the Respondent no.4 in not initiating any action in consideration of the orders dated 15/05/2019 passed by Respondent no.3 in File no A18960/2012 rn respect of the land admeasuring Acres 2-00 guntas in survey no.1901/B situated at h/adikonda Village of Hanamkonda Mandal, as being arbitrary, unjust, and violation of Article 14. 19.21 and 300-A of constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent no.4 to conduct enquiry as per the orders passed by the Respondent no.3 in File no 41896012012 dated 15t05t2019.

¶50

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶51

Petition-under Sectron¹ 5'l CPC^prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petitron, the High Court may be^pleased to issue interim directions to the Respondent no 4 to forthwith conduct enquiry and^pass necessary orders in consideratron of the orders dated 15-05-2019 passed by Respondent no-3 in File no N896012012,^pendrng disposal of the Writ Petition.

¶52

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI N.KRISHNA SUMANTH FOR SRI VIVEK JAIN Counsel for the Respondent Nos.'l TO 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5:^--

¶53

W.P.NO: 10331 o:2021

¶54

Between:

¶55

N.Awantika Devi, Wo N.Ramakflshna Chowdary, D/o T rorti tieddy Upendra [9.0-a-V_4OrI^{Z0 ye.ars Occupation Housewife, Rk"1 t,J,07-Fhr-r;_} [ Metro^patm -irove, Somajiguda, Hyderabad _ 500()g2

¶56

..PETITIONER

¶57

AND

¶58

The State of Telangana, Represented by its principal Sercre ary Revenue qeparlme'rt, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶59

The Distrir;t⁽ )ollector, Wardngal.

¶60

The Revenur , Divisional Officer, Kazipet lr,4andal, Warangitl l_lrb rn

¶61

The I ahsi da^-, Kazipet Mandal, Waranqal Urban Di ,tri,;t^'

¶62

Sri Nelrkarrti ,4urali Krishna, S/o N.Kris6na Swamy, R/cr H N,r^.t 1 129,3, Prashanth Nr rgar, Kazipet, Warangal Urban Distri6i Te,lanc:. na

¶63

. .RESPONDENTS

¶64

Petitiorr und( r Artrcle 226 of rhe constitution of rncii;r p,rayrr g that in the circumstances siat )d in the affidavit filed therewith, the H clrr Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order/s more particurarry onr: rn th l rarrrre of writ of Mandanrus for dr:cl rring the action of the Respondent no 4 ir rot inrtrating any action in considera ion of the orders dated lslosl2olg pirss,:o by Respondent no 3 in File no fuBgr ;5i2012 in respect of the land admeasur nq /\ rre: 2 00 guntas in survey no.r901/[ situated at Madikonda Viflage or I-]anarnkr.nd; [,4andal. as being arbitrary, urrju rt, and violation of Article 14, 19, 21 ,rno :iC() A o, constitution o[ India and conseq tently direct the Respondenl no.4 tc cc,nl rc er qurry as per the orders passr:d by the Respondent no.3 rn File no A tli)65 2012 dated 15t05t2019.

¶65

lA NO: 1 OF 2021

¶66

Petition rinder Sectron 151 cPC praying that in the crroun*iran(es sti)ted in the afridavit fileo in sr pr)ort of lhe petition, the High court rna1, be r 6:lea;ed to rssue interm directio.s to he Respondent no.4 to forthwith co,duct :rrqurry ancl pass necessary orders in consideration of the orders dated^{.15,05,i,(r19} passed by Respondent no.3 ir F le no fu8965/2012, pending disposal of lhe \,rit F,etrtron

¶67

Counsel for the Petiti rner: SRI N.KRISHNA SUMANTH FOR SRI VTVEK JAtN Counsel for the Resp:ndents: GP FOR REVENUE

¶68

The Court made the f >llowing: COMMON ORDER

¶69

THE IION' BLE SRI .II]STICI.],^K.LAKSHMAN

¶70

WRIT PETITION Nos.9532 t032r^{AND t0331 OF 2021}

¶71

COMMON ORDT]R:

¶72

Sri N. Krishna Sumanth. learttcci^{cot-tnsel. rcprcscntingSri Vivek} Jain, learned counsel lor the^{petitionct'ssecks pertrtissionof this Coult to} withdraw the present u'rit pctitiorrs^rr ith lilrcrtl to flle^{lresh writ} petitions. I{e has also endorscd on tltc bLrndlcs^{to thc said eflect. Hehas} also fited Court Slips obtainecl^{sccking pcrtnissiott to r'"ithdraw. Thesaid} Court Slips arc placed otr^rccorcl.

¶73

Granting pcnnission^{as soug.ht. Illc:e rr ril pctitions are disrnissed} as withdrarvn with a^Iibe rt1' to lilc^{ticslr rr rit pctitions.Consequently,} rnisccllaneous pctitions. il'^{artr. pcnrlirrq rn tltcsc \ritpetitions.shall}

¶74

stand closed.

¶75

//TRUE COPY//

¶76

SD/. K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR secrror€-rcEr-

¶77

¶78

1 One CC to SRI VIVEK JA|N, Advocate IOpUCi 2 Iwo CCs to GP FOR REVFNUE, High bourt f6r tne State of Tetangana, at Hyderabad. [OUTI 3 Two CD Copies PSK. SB

8ttq,

HIGH COUIIT

DATED:1 1l )412023

'r[

fcrrtt"tD^N ORDER

WP.Nos.9532, 10321 AND 1 0331 of 2021

¶85

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONS AS WITHDR,\WN WITHOUT COSTS.

¶86

(L'?n"' \r\c "j

N.Awantika Devi v. The State of Telangana and 4 other

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

N.Awantika Devi v. The State of Telangana and 4 other

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. Afser Begum Vs The State of Telangana and 6 Others

Sri. Mohd Toufeeq Vs The Secretary Govt of India and 2 others

J.Vijendar Vs The Union of India

N.Awantika Devi Vs The State of Telangana

N.Awantika Devi Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others

Khaja Naseeruddin and another Vs The State of Telangana and 3 others