It is a miscellaneous order where the High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner. The court also vacated interim orders granted in a related interim petition.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn; interim orders were vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
|32s21
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
IVONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION NO: 9311 OF 201 3
Between:
IMd. Zaki Uddin, Son of late Md. Zia Uddin, Aged about 46 years, Occ Business, Residing at H.No.21, Karkhana, Secunderabad.
AND
...PETITTONER
Petition under Article 226 of the Consritution of tndia or"ri;[=iri;","fH: circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction, more preferably one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent in sealing the Mulgi which has no number situated at Adjacent to ldga, Kharkhana, Secunderabad, as illegal, arbitrary and unreasonable and consequently direct the respondents to break open the seal made to the premises and hand over all the belongings of the petitioner, in the interest of justice
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 11610 OF 2013)
Petitign under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to break the seal of mulgi permitting the petitioner to continue his business till the end of June, 2013, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V. RAMCHANDER GOUD
Counsel for Respondent No. 1: SRI K.R KOTESWERA RAO
(SR SC FOR CANTONMENT)
Counsel for Respondent No. 2: SRI Y V RAVI PRASAD
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITION No.9311 of 2013
ORDER:
The learned counsel representing Sri V.Ramchander Goud, the learned counsel on record, appearing on bel-ralf of petitioner brings to the notice of this Court that the cause of action in the present Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and seeks leave of this Court for withdra wal of W.P.No.9311 of 2013.
Bringing the said submissions on record, the W.P.No.9311 of 2013 is dismissed as withdrawn. Hovvever, there shall be no order as to costs.
Interim orders granted by this Court on 04.O4.2OI3
passed in W.P.MP.No.11610 of 2013 shall stand vacated.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
SD/. P.PADM/\NABHAREDDY ASSrsTl$[ REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// <-ft)
SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to Sri VRamchander GoudAdvocate [OPUC] 2 One CC to Sri Y VRavi PrasadAdvocate [OPUC] 3 O;; aa to SriK.R Koteswera Rao(SR SC FOR CANTONTMENI')Advocate loPUCl
I
HI(3H COURT
DATED: 2110812023
.., L-. ! i;\l-i. o
I
,<br>!I 1s sEP zul c, )
<br>\ J,.
\ .<br>ORDER
WP.No.9311 of 2013
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITIHDRAWN,
WITHOI.'T COSTS
*
<br>
IMd. Zaki Uddin
Secunderabad Cantonment Board
Mrs. Annesa Begum
SUREPALLI NANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
