The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by M/s Legend Minerals as infructuous since the petitioner contended the cause of action no longer survives for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
132s21
,,O" 'OU*' FOR (Special Original THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT Jurisdiction) HYOERABAD
MONDAY, THE TWENW FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENryTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE,SUREPALLINANDA
WRIT PETITIO N NO: 28445 OF 2016
Between:
M/s Legend Minerals, Rep. byits ProprietorDr-J.Pradeep-Reddy, aged.ab-out 42 yeirs, R/o H.No.10-3-3i1l7lA,Castel Hills, Road No.3, Near NMDC, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 225 of lheConstitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavitfiledtherewith,the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction moreparticularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring theactionof the respondentsto enterinto the mining area withoutprior notice isillegal, arbitrary, improper' unjust' unconslitutional and in violation ofPrinciplesof Natural Justice and alsoin violation of Articles 14 and 21 of theconstitutionof lndia and consequently direct
fi I i I ! Ii i t
the respondents in not interfere with the petitioner's mining operations until ending of lease period.
l.A. 1oF 201 P. NO: 35221 OF 2016
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumsl:ances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct, the respondents in not interfere with the petitioner's mining operations until ending of lease period pending disposal of the writ petition.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WP MP. NO: 36126 OF 20161
i ,ii ! l
Petition.under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumslances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of proceedings No.10002/R1-3/2016, darted 24.08.2016 issued by the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner M/s. Y.ANUPAMA DEVI
Counsel for the Respondent No.1, 2 & 4: GP FOR INDUSTRIES & COMMERCE Counsel forthe Respondent No.3: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & IIURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.s to 7: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA WRIT PETITION .24445()F 2016
ORDER:
It is represented by learn€d counsel for the petitioner
that the cause of action in the present writ petition does not su rvive for adjudication.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ
Petition, shall stand closed.
/
SD/-V.KAVITHA ASSISTAUIREGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// <:19
SECTION OFFICER
To,
?n^c,-
HIGH COURT
DATED: 21lOBl2O23
ORDER
L ST ATE oA
4
,s
u o
.},
of, S$ STP um
\o .r*
I
o
) q o s'r C^
--i:i'- -;
WP.No.28MS of 2O16
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION
AS INFRUCTUOUS,
WTHOUT COSTS
tn^4, o{91-3.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition survives for adjudication given the subject matter is no longer alive.
M/s Legend Minerals, Rep. by Proprietor Dr. J. Pradeep Reddy
The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Industries and Commerce Department of Mines and Geology
Surepalli Nanda
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
