A single-judge bench of the High Court of Telangana heard a writ petition by four Sub Station Operators seeking appointment as Junior Linemen. The court found that the factual circumstances supporting the petition no longer existed.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3167 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HO ,BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
l*,r r=r,r,oN No: 701 oF zolo
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution oflndiapraying that in the circumstances stated iri the affidavit filed therewith,the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction especially one in the nature ofwrit of mandamus: i) declaring the action of therespondent in not issuing orders of I appointment topetitione?s as JLMpursuantto the selection test conducted vide I I notifications dt. 8 6.2006 and dt. 20.10.2006 as illegal andarbitrary
ii) consequently lire, t-he respondent to issue orders of appo l'me,rt to petitioners pursuant to the lu,jg ncnt rendered by I this Hon'ble Court in V/ A.N,;.1434 of 2008 dt. 10.11.2009 w.e . the date I and which others \ ere c ivern the orders of I appointment, duly grrntiAg all other consequential benefrts
LA. NO: 1 OF 201()CI/l P. NO: 883 OF 2010) ^/
Petition ,nd"r. Sultion 151 CPC praying that in the circr- rnst;rnces stated in the affidavit filed ir srp pbrt I of the petition, the High Court may l)rl pl.ased to direct the respondent k) co rsider cases of I the petitioners for appoirtrrenl to the post of JLM, as directec by ttriS I Hon'ble Court in W.A.No.14ll4 of 2 (-t08 and batch dt. 10.1't .2009
l.A. NO:2OF 2010CI'V P. NO: 2363 OF 2010)
Between:
I| |
PetitionunderSectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin ! the affidavitfiled in sulport iof the petition, the High Court may be pleasedto vacate the interim orde/ Idt.22-01-2010in W.P.ltil.P.No.883of 2010 in W'P.No. I 7O1 of 2010 in theinterebt of justice. I
Counsel for thePetitio ,J" rS: SRI K. VASUDEVAREDDY Counsel for theResPo Lents: Mr. ZAKIRALI DANISH,S.C' FOR TSNPDCL
The Court madethe foll Iowing: ORDER
1'HE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISiHEI{ REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.7O1 of 2010
ORDER
'lh.-. learned counsel for the petitior-re:s, hzrs stated that
the ciru.;t- of action in the present writ l)(rtit ion does not surv Lve .nd the writ petition has becone inlir,rctr-rous
lie :c,rding the above made submission, t hc present urit
petit,on s drsmissed as infructuous.
l)e rcling miscellaneous petitions, if anv shrrll also stand
disn'ris,se C There shali be no order as to costs
SD/.NAYANICI] ANDRA SEKHAR RAO /\s; SISTANTREGTS AR
//TRUECOPY// SECTIOoFFICER
To,
/ASUDEVAREDDY,Advocate [Ot]UCl 1 Onerlrl1rSRl K 2 One I SRI ZRKIR IALI DANISH' S'C.fOT TSNPTX' L I()PUCI Two CDI )opies
MP swc/
HIGiH COURT
DATI]D:0910312023
ti0
'l
ORDER
WP.Nirc,.701 of 2010
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRIJCTUOUS WITHOIJT COSTS
Ct(-
& u,l:1
h
Sra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition filed for appointment as JLM stands dismissed as infructuous?
Akuthota Thirupati
Udutha Raju
K. Ratnakar
Kethipally Ralu
The Northern Power Distribution Company of A.P. Limited
The Superintendent Engineer (Operations)
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
