Dismissed
K. Mamatha d/o Ramalingaiah, 44 years, v. The Project Officer
Telangana HCWP/34731/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD[ 3167 ]…
What the court decided
AI extract
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD[ 3167 ]…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT F 3167 ] THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD[ (Special Original Jurisdiction)
M NDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONO RABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
nJ^,r r= TITIO NNO i 34731 OF 2013
Between:
| 1l | K. Mamathad/oRamalingaiah. 44 years,AganwadiWorker.Yellandu O/oICDS ProjectOfficer,Khammam KhammamDistrict |
|---|---|
| 2) | B. Nirmalad/oNarasimha Aged44 years,Aganwadiworker,Yellandu O/oICDS ProjectOfficer,Khammam KhammamDistrict |
| 3l | L.Vanaja d/o Thirupathaiah, Aged 38years,AganwadiWorker,Yellandu O/oICDS ProjectOfficer,Khammam KhammamDistrict |
| 4l | A. Sakubaid/oRamulu, 44 yea$,AganwadiWorker,Yellandu O/oICDS Projectofflcer,Khammam KhammamDistrict |
| 5l | K.VEnkatanarasammad/oChinnabi 44yearc, AganwadiWorker,Yellandu O/oICDS ProjectOfficer,Khammam KhammamDistrict |
| 6l | U. Padmavathid/oU. Rajaiah. 43 years,AganwadiWorker,Yellandu O/oICDS ProjectOfficer,Khammam KhammamDistrict |
| 7l | M.Sunithaw/oVenkateswaru, 45 years,AganwadiWorker,Kothagudem, O/oICDS ProjectOfficer,Khammam KhammamDistrict |
| 8l | D.ArunaKumarid/oMallaiah, 44years, AganwadiWorker,Yellandu O/oICDS ProjectOfficer,Khammam KhammamDistrict |
| el | R.AnanthaLaxmid/oBushanam, 38years,AganwadiWorker.Yellandu |
l I I I I I ,i ; I I I 1
L
I I a
t
| O/oICDSF'rojec.Officer,Khammam KhammamDistr ct |
|
|---|---|
| 101 | D.Victoriaw/otaju, 34years,p,ganr^aci Worker,yellandu O/oICDSFrojecC)Fficer,Khammam KhammamDistr:t Petitioners |
| VS | |
| 1l | TheProjectOfFic)r, IntegratedChild)evelopmentProject Khammam,KhanmamDistrict |
| 2l | ChildDevelcprnettProjectOFficer, ICDS Project,'/eandu,Khammam Khammam Distri:t |
| 3l | RegionallorntDi e(:tor,Women Development & ChildWellarr:I epartment,Khammam KhammamDistri:t |
| 4l | Commissioner&)irector,Women Development& ChildWelfareDegrsr166n1,GovernmentofAP Door No.8-3-it2t,/engalRao Nagar, SRNagar,,\mee'pr:t,AP500038 |
| sl | TheGovernrnent)fAndhrapradeshrepresented ByitsPrincipalS:cretary,DepartmentforWomen, ChildDevelopnrert:ndSenior Citizens, Secretariatlluidirg;,Hyderabad .. Respondent:s |
II
Petition und€ r l\rt cle 226 of the Constitution of lndia przr,,,ing that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the Hirlh Cor.rrt may be pleased to issue a v/ril, o'der or direction, more in the nature of wril of mandamus, declaring the action c,f he respondents in not considering anc appointing the petitioners as Superviso Grade-ll in so far as it relates to th: 26:; vacancies earmarked in Zonr:-V 1'om the feeder category for Anganv/adi Workers is concerned, as arbitrary', ilegal, discriminatory and u nconstitutio n€rl,riolating Article 14, 16 and 21 oi' the(lonstitution of lndia, and consequerntly direct the respondents to consider and appoint the petitioners to the pos,1 of Supervisor Grade-ll in so far :rs it elates to the 265 vacancies in Zone- v earmarked for Anganwadi Workers is c rncerned strictly as per the rules in [orr::e r-rnder ICDS Project, taking into accc unt their length of service and other r:riteria for such appoinlment.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(WP P. NO: 43189 OF 2013)
Petition underseltion 1s1 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in I the affidavit filed in suppbrl of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct I the respondents to consider and appolnt the petitioners to the post of Supervisor Grade-ll in so far as it lrelates I to the 26s vacancies earmarked for Anganwadi workers in Zone-V is doncerned strictly as per the rules in force under lcDS l- Project, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the PetitioJers : M/S. S.V. IND|RA (NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Resporldents: THE ADDITIONAL ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR Iee ron woMENDEVELoeMENT & cHtLD wELFARE
The Court made the follbwing: ORDER
THE HO, ['BLE sRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK R,EiDDl.
u RIT PETITIO N No.3473l of2O13 ORDER:
Th.re *'as nc) representation on beharf .f :he learn.d counsel lbr thc petitioners when this matter rvas tal.:en up lor hearing on C,l .r)2 2023 and 20.O2.2023. Therefore, thc rnatter ^.,urs directcd to be Lsted under the caption "For Orders,, on 27.O2.2023. Ar_-c, irrlingly, the matter was listed rrncle r the (taption "For Orders" on 2Z .t)2 .2023. However, when the rrrattcr was called, there was rro representation for the learne,d <.,unsel for petitioners. lJe;rc:, the matter was directed to be list,3rj -rnrler the caption "For I)ism ss;ai,, on 06.O3.2O23.
Today, th, ru qtL I he matter appears under t.hs c a 1.rtio n ,For Dismissal', thert: I s no representation, yet again, for tlrr: le arned counsel for th,: pet ticners when it is taken up for heartr 13.
Therefore, th:,,vrit petition is dismissed for non_pr os;ecution. Pending Mis:ellaneous petitions, if any, shall irlrso stand
dismissecl. No ordt r as to costs.
St)i. K. VENKAIAH ASSISTA,NTREGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SE:#N oFFIcER /
To,
1 One CC to M/S. S'/ INDIRA Advocate [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to the Ad < iticnal Advocate General, High Court for .hr-. State of Tela ngana at Hyder rb,ad. [OUT]
l i
HIGH COURT
DATED:06/03/,2d 23
ORDER
W.P.No.34731 o 2013
-r' - .-, ---Y. - 1AT( t-iA
.4,
'',,<-
,Y
-)
,\ i:rt lsll
.)
.....
..
DISMISSING'I'H E WRITPETITION FOR NON-PR()SECUTION WITHOUT COISTS
*?$
K. Mamatha
B. Nirmala
L. Vanaja
A. Sakuba
K. Venkatanarasa
U. Padmavathi
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court