In a writ petition challenging the non-grant of pension to a retired teacher, the High Court of Telangana disposed of the matter as infructuous due to the efflux of time, without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3301 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO: 6814 OF 2014
Between:
B. Manohar, S/o. B. Perappa, aged about 62 years, Occ. Retd. PET Teacher, 11 No. 1-7-131l27, Musheerabad, Hyderabad.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in not granting thepension of thepetitioner from the date of retirement i.e.,01.'10.2010 till the date is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violation of principles of naturaljustice and also against the Articles 14. 19 and 21 of Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to release the pension of the petitioner as PET Teacher in the 3rd respondent school.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2014(WP P. NO: 8433 oF 20141
Petition under Section 151 CPCpraying that in the circumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents to release 50% of thepension amount by consideringthe representation 11.02.2011 of thepetitioner from the date of retirementi.e., 01.10.2010 retired as PET Teacher in the 3rd respondent school,pending disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI V.DURGA NAGESWARA RAO FOR
M/s. N.NAGAVANI PRASUNA
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No.6 814 0F 2014
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondents in not granting pension to the petitioner from the date of his retirement, i.e., O1.10.2010, as itlegal and arbitrary and consequently, to direct the respondenLs to release the pension of the petitioner.
Miscelianeous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. No costs.
,/
SD/. P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// 7.r SECNdifoFFICER
To
1 One CC to M/s. N.NAGAVANI PRASUNA, Advocate IOPUCI 2 Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT] .) Two CD Copies PSK. GJP \ Y
HIGH COURT
DATED:0611012023
ORDER
WP.No.6814 of 2014
1 $E SI4 IC
k
o
ij rtirrttzrzl
],
t
.O
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
#
3o
B. Manohar
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Pulla Kartik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
