High Court of Telangana hearing a writ petition by two applicants seeking declaration that a selection notice was illegal. The court found the cause of action had expired due to the passage of time.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3301 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO: 11306 0F 2013
Between:
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constltution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of lvlandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs, order or direction, to declare Notice - 1 1 dated 16.03.2013, on the file of the 1.t and 2"d respondents herein, in so far as the petitioners are concerned, as unjust, unreasonable, illegal and violation of Article 14 &16 of the Constitution of lndia and contrary to the established principles of law and thereby to hold that the petitioners are entitled for the selection and appointment to the post of Junior Plant Attendant (JPA) in pursuance to the Notification dated 05.O1.011 and 17.10.2011, on the file of the 1't and 2nd respondents and consequently direct the respondents herein to follow the reservation and allow the petitioners herein for further selection process including the 'trade test' scheduled to be held on 13.04.2013 of at any subsequent date and to make selection and issue
appointment order t l the petitioners herein to the pos of JLrn lr l)lant Attendant (JPA)
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(lVPMP. NO:14020 OF 2013)
Petition unde Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirr umstances stated in the affidavit filed n support of the petition, the High Court rray le pleased to direct the Respondents herein to allow the petitioners herein t,) fL rther selection process including'ttre trade test' scheduled to be hel I on 13.4-i,.O13 or at any subsequent date, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Peti iioner: SRl. VENKAT REDDY THIPoARTJI
Counsel for the Res rondent No.3: GP FOR ENERGY
Counsel for the Res londent Nos.1&2: M/s. K. UDAYA SRI
The Court made the following: ORDER
I
{ tt
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No.l13O 6 0F 2013
ORDER:
Thrs Writ Petition is hled seeking to declare the impugned Notice - 1I, dated 16.03.2013, on the file of the 1.tand 2nd respondcnts, insofar as the petitioners herein are concerned, as illegal and arbitrary..
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. No costs.
SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
To,
secnoru6rFi6En
\lr.
HIGH COURI'
DATED:0511C 12023
ORDER
-
..:.'-,
(.,. ,
,,ii
irl
rr i,
{ :- )l
\S .' ,i
(\r
Ca
WP.No.11306 of 2013
DISMISSING'THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
do}
\rs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition with respect to employment selection survives due to efflux of time.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vankudavath Jyothi
Jamala Bai
Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Corporation Limited
Chief General Manager (HR), APGENCO
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Pulla Kartik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
