High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner challenging a Labour Court award as infructuous on the ground that the primary respondent had already retired from service.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous due to retirement of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3167 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 5944 OF 2007
Between:
Khaja Hussain, S/o: Abdul Wahab, Aged 36 years, Working as Fitter O/o. Municipal Office, Gadwal, Mahabubnagar District.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to set aside the Awardpassed in lD No. 79 of 2OO4 by the Labour Court-lll, Hyderabad by its Judgmenl dl. 28-12-2005 which was published in A.P. Gazette Vide G.O.Rt.No. 638 dt. 24-3-2006.x
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2007(rVPMP. NO: 7 595 0F 2007)
Petition unde Section 151 CPC praying that in the circLmstances stated in the affidavit fik:d in .. upport of the petition, the High Court ma.r t,e p leased to
suspend the ooerati ;n ol Award passed in lD No. 79 of 2OO4 b/ the Labour Courtlll, Hyderabad by is Judgment dt. 28-12-2005 published n A.t). Gazette Vide G.O.RI No 638 d.. 14'3-2006.
Counsel for the Pelitioner: SRl. M. BHARAT SHAH REPRE:;ENTtNG K. R. SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Re ;pondent No.1: SRl. P RAGHAVENDRA Rt:DDy
Counsel for the Re ipondent 2 and 3: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel for the Re ;pondent No.4: N. PRAVEEN KUMAR(S O FOtt MC, TELANGANA)
The Court made th, r following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITI ONN0.5944 of 2OOz
ORDER:
Sri M. Bharat Shah, the learned counsel representing Sri K.R. Srinivas, the learned counsel for the petitioner, has stated that the respondent No.l has already retired from service, and therefore, the cause of action in the present writ petition does not survive and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the above made submission, the present writ
petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, il any sha-Il also stand
dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/- K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTI OFFICER
To,
HIGH COURI
DATED:1110t.12023
,LLa)'
1. ,
i,':
ii
"$ ur ll
*t -Jl
i
,t;
q<br>t--
ORDER
WP.No.5944 of 2007
DISMISSIN(i THE WP AS INFRUC TUOUS
WITHOUT C OSTS.
lq. 1u'+-l( -o
Khaja Hussain
T. Ram Reddy
State of Andhra Pradesh
The Director and Commissioner of Municipal Administration
The Commissioner, Gadwal Municipality
A. Abhisek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
