The Hon'ble High Court of Telangana dismissed a writ petition filed by JLM Rajesh challenging the revised seniority list of Junior Line Men as infructious, as the cause did not survive due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
I I I
[3301 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
IV1ONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO: 5753 OF 2014
Between:
G. Rajesh, S/o Balanarsu, Aged about 30 years, Occ Junior Line Man, 0/o Drvisional Engineer, Toopran Division, Gajwel Section, Head Quarter. Pidched, t,4edak District.
...PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying thal in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of lt4andamus, declaring the entire action of the respondents in preparing the revised Seniority List of Junior Line Men of Toopran Division Vide Memo.No.DEE/OP/TPRN/ADM/JAO/D. No.869 l2O1 1,Dt-28.1 O.201 1 basing on the age of the individuals instead of preparing the same as per merit list prepared at the time of appointment !n the cadre of Junior line men is highly illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper and contrary to the variousjudicial pronouncements and consequently direct the respondents topromote thepetitioner as Assistant Line t\4en by preparing fresh seniority list in the cadre of Junior Line men of Toopran Division by strictly following merit list prepared at time of appointment in the cadre of Junior Line men with all consequential benefits
l.A. NO: 1OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 7149 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that In the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to consider the case of the petitioner forpromotion to thepost of Assistant Line Men by redrawing the seniority list Vide t,4emo.No.DEE/OP/TPRN/ ADtvl/JAO/D. No.869/201 1, Dl:28.10.2O1 1 in the cadre of Junior Line lvlen of Toopran Division by strictly following merit listprepared at time of appointment Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S. SATYANARAYANA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI R. VINOD REDDY (SG FOR TSSPDCL) The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KAR"T]IK
'WRIT PETITION No.5753 of 2Ol4
ORDER:
This Writ Pctition rs filcd lrcirrg aggrievcd by tirr ar:Lion of the rcspondcnts in picparing the rcvisecl Scr-rioritv Lis of thc Junior Linemen o[ Toopl an Divisiorr vide nrt'rno dated 28. I O.2t.1
Miscellanecus petitions penciing, if zrnr,, shall stand :losed. No
COS tS
\
sD/- P. PADlil/\NI\BHAREDDY ,lSSISTI\NI. REGISTRAR - ,TRUE COPY// l;ECTION OFrtcen
To
1 2 3:: 33 [3Ri R tr-T3HS".l&?t?+3l?"li&tfil]E3tr 3 , TwoCD CoPie: BN GJP
/ns
HIGH COURT
DATED:091101:2023
ORDER
WP.No.5753 of2014
z 17t;. STAI'€ o
B
;1
1 too[1 2m -r1a
.,.
DISMISSING'I'HEWRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTLIOUS WITHOUT COSTS
as
tF
G. Rajesh
The A.P.Central Power Distribution Company Limited
Pulla Kartiik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
