Dismissed
M Laskhmikanthayya v. State of Tg,Scy,Revenue,Hyd, am 5
Telangana HCWP/5564/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVASRAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 5564 OF 2017
Between:
Malladi Laskhmikanthayya, S/o. Subbaiah,aged about58 years, Occ Nil, R/o H.No.3-125, Bore Nariipur, MangapetaMandal, Jayashankar Bhupalapalli District, Telangana State.
.,.PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of lheConstitutionof lndia prayingthat in the circumstances stated in theaffidavit filed therewith,the High Court maybe pleased to issue a writ, order or direction moreparticularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to direct the2nd Respondent to conduct enquirywith regard to the caste status of the unofficialRespondents basing on the Representation submitted by thepetitioner dated17.08.2016 whichwas sent on 19.08.2016
-J I
: i I
l.A. NCt: 1OF 2017( 4/PMP. NO: 6781 OF 2017l.
retition und€ ' liection 151 CPC praying that in the o r tuntstances stated in the :ffidavit frled in support of the petition, the High Cou 1 Ta'/ be pleased to direct the 2nd Re: condents lo consider the Representat o'r o' the petitioner dated' 7.08.2016
Gouns,-.| for the Pel tioner: SRI. B S N NAIDU(Not Present)
Couns,:l for the Rer pondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR REVENUT
Counsr:l for the Rer pondent Nos.4, 5&6: None appeared
The Court made th€ following: ORDER
I
(
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.5554 OF 2OL7
ORDER:-
When the matter is taken up for hearing, on O2.O2.2O23 therc was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. To give one opportunity to tlre petitioner, matter was posted to 08.02.2023 under the caption,for dismissal'. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner in morning session and afternoon session in spite of posting the matter for dismissal.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
SD/-P.PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT EGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
To,
1 One CC to SRI B S N NAIDU Advocate [OPUC] 2 Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Courtfor theState of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 3 Two CD Copies KKS sw'
\4
HIGI{ COUR-'
DATED:08l0i 12023
ORDER
('.. \fi 5IAf€ O3
. ,.-;
)
11 \1iq 1[8
t,)
, /i,
' :..
WP.l,lo.5564 )f 2017
DISNIISSING )F THE WP FOR NON-PF OSECUTION WIT}IOUT CC STS
tn
6--
jlz,l>s
s(o
Malladi Laskhmikanthayya
The State of Telangana
The District Collector
The Tahsildar
Malladi @ Korem Somasundaram
Korem Venkat
J. SREENIVAS RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court