In a writ petition challenging the non-placement of indents for palmolein oil under an alleged agreement, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause no longer survives, leading the court to dismiss it as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 34096 OF 2014
Between:
M/s. Deepak Trading Company, rep. by its Managing Partner Deepak Agarwal, S/o Sri Jagdish Agarwal Aged 38 years, Occ: Business Office Add. Shop No.116, Sri Krupa Market Mahaboob Mansion, Malakpet, Hyderabad
..PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, order or direction preferably Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 3 and 4 in not placing the indents to the petitioner for supply of Vijaya Brand Palmolein Oil through 5th respondent for six ICDS Projects of Mahaboob Nagar District in view of subsisting agreement dated 05.12.2013 and latest letter addressed by the 5th respondent dated 26 09.2014 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to agreement dated 05.12.2013 and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents 3 and 4 to place indents to the petitioner without any delay and continue the same
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 42651 OF 2014)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to direct the respondents 3 and 4 to place indents in favor of the petitioner in view of the subsisting agreement dated 05.12.20'13 and latest letter addressed by the Sth respondent dated 26.09.2014. pending disposal of the writpetition in the interest ofjustice
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 45509 OF 20141
Between:
Kendria Bhandar, a Welfare Project under the Agencies of Govt. of lndia, Putlibowli, Koti, Hyderabad, Rep. by its Divisional Manager.
...PETITIONER/PROPOSED RESPONDENT No.6
AND
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS
Petition under liection'l 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioner herein as party Respondent No.6 in the above W.P.No.34096 of 2014 and also in W P.M.P.No.42651 of 2014 in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOWTURU PAVAN KUMAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.'1,2&4: GP FOR WOMEN DEV,CHILD WELFARE
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3&5: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Proposed Respondent No.6: SRI R N HEMENDRANATH REDDY
The Court made the following: ORDER
,/
IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENrVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION No.34O96 of 2O\4
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
in view of the above submission, this writ petition IS
dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand
closed "
SD/-K.VENKAIAH
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// en, SECTidN OFFICER
To,
KKS S \'
BSR
HIGH COURT
DATED:0810212023
14 14:
C
t il
,) 0 u t1 E!I 20n
:.,.
-.t
.:., ;/
ORDER
WP.No.34096 of 2014
DISMISSING OF THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
q
1g
gse
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication given the submissions by counsel.
M/s. Deepak Trading Company, rep. by Deepak Agarwal
The Government of Telangana
Director of Women Development & Child Welfare
Joint Collector/Chairman, District Purchase Committee
Project Director, District Women and Child Development Agency
A.P.Co-operative Oil Seeds Growers Federation, Limited
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
