Writ petition challenging the inclusion of land in a prohibitory list as illegal and arbitrary because the underlying civil order was closed. The High Court directed respondents to delete the property from the list and disposed of the petition.
Directing the respondents to delete the subject property from the list of prohibited properties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3256 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 45824 OF 2022
Between:
G.Suresh Kumar, S/o late G.Pentaiah Aged about 49 years, Occ Business Rl/o H No 2-130123, Kismpatpura Village, Rajendemagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
...PETITIONER
AND
.,.RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents Nos 2 and 3 in listing the land admeasuring Ac 20-12 gts in Sy No 149 of Kismathpura village, Rajendernagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, inprohibitory list as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to forthwith to delete the scheduleproperty from the list of theprohibitory list as the orderdt 24-10-2016passed in lA No.819/2016 in OS No. 1'153i2016passed by the Hon'ble XIV Addl District Session Judge Ranga Reddy District atLB nagar not in existence pending disposal of the writ.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 to forthwith to delete the schedule property from the list of theprohibitory list as the order dt 24-10-2016passed in IA No. 81912016 in OS No. 115312016passed by the Hon'ble XIV Addl District Session Judge Ranga Reddy Dsitrict at LB nagar is no more in existence.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAJAGOPALLAVANTAYI
Counsel for the Respondents: ASSSISTANT GPFOR STAMPSAND REGISTRATION
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.45824 of 2022
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration appearing for the respondents.
2
about the closure of the intcrim order dated 24.10.2016 passed in the aforesaid I.A, responderlt Nos.2 and 3 are continuing the subject property in the prohibited properties list, thereby preventing the petitioner from making any transactions in respect of the subject property.
-..."
rrr-_-.
3
IJ Accordingly, the q,ri t petition is disposed of. There shall
be no orders as to costs
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petltion
shall stand closed.
SD/. P. PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANT REGIP/TRAR
//TRUE COPY//
L SECTION OFFICER
TJ cJP !y*
HIGH COURT
DATED:1010212023
ORDER
.1 r. I i€
(
)
0 3 fl I 2[?3 f':
(-)
t:
WP.No.45824 ot 2022
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION
WTHOUT COSTS.
v)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents should delete the subject property from the prohibitory list after the underlying civil order ceased to operate?
Whether the continuation of the property in the prohibitory list despite the closure of the previous interim order is illegal and arbitrary?
G.Suresh Kumar
The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Stamps and Registration), Secretariat, Hyderabad
The District Registrar, Ranga Reddy District
The Sub Registrar, Gandipet at Narsingi Ranga Reddy District
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
