Petitioners sought a writ of mandamus quashing a land sale registration due to alleged lack of jurisdiction in land conversion. The High Court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
l
Ir I
.1
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3256]
FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO: 34142 OF 2022
Between:
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandasrus declaring the action of the Respondents No.4 Registering the Sale Deed in favor of Respondents no.7, 8, 9 inspite of lhe Land being converted from Agriculture to Non Agriculture being without havingjurisdiction as illegal,
l
arbitrary and contrarv .o law and cc,nsequently directing the Respondent.No. 4 to cancel the same.
lA NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under ijection 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant lnterim Directio r directing Respondent no.7, B, 9 from further executing any Sale Deeds or ar y other Documents in respect of Land purchased by them pending disposal of tl e writ petition.
lA NO: 2 OF 2022
Petition under iection 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed ir support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Responderts No 7 B, 9 Restraining from changing the nature of property by Constrr cting, levelling or Digging Pits and other Construction activities over the $ulrject Propertl,.
Counsel for the Petit oners: SRI. .1. MOHAN SINGH
Counsel for the ResJ,ondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Rest,ondent Nos.5 to 9: SRl. MD. IQBAL ALI JAVID
The Court made the bllowing: ORDER
I I
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
IVRIT PETITION No.34142 of 2022
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a letter, dated 09 .O2.2O23 in the Registry seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
sD/- T. SRINIVAS / DEPUWREGISTRAR /
i/TRUE COPY' Y SECTION OFFICER
To, 1 one cc to SriJ. .Mohan.iifrxfi1'foTj:jfliBBL"r . One CC toSri. Md. lqbal ' a . iil; dd.i;'cpiot f,"r"n';,Hi;h C"''t forihe staie or relansanaat Hvderabad. [OUT] 4. Two CDCopies CHR
I t
,1
HIGH COURT
DATED:1010212)23
ORDER
W.P.No.34142 of 2022
6
ca 1\ \c"x
r/
(), .
, .,;'
DISMISSING'HE WRI-T PETITION AS WITHDRA A/N WITHOUT COSTS
(<br>9
_s-,/
Mohd Ateeq Ahmed
Mohammed Naser Ahmed
Mohammed Abdul Amer
The State of Telangana
The District Collector, Sangareddy District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Zaheerabad Division
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
