Petitioner sought writ challenging land dispossession without fair compensation. Court permitted withdrawal of petition with liberty to approach later and dismissed it as withdrawn without costs.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted. Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32s5 ]
HIGH COURTFOR THESTATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY. THENINTH DAYOF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSANDAND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICEMUMMINENISUDHEER KUMAR
WRIT P ETITION NO:10601 OF 2017
Between
Mrs. Vislavath Chavali, w/o Late LambadiKashna agedyears,Occ agriculture r/o Pothubanda Thanda,Kandukur Mandal,Ranga R.:P,+t,5i,|"1
AND
3 Tahsildar,. Kandukur Mandal, Ranqa Reddy District
...RESpoNDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ. Order or drrection more particularly one in the nature of Writ of f\4andamus declaring action of the respondents in applying the order in Progs.No. 8.11409-612016 dated 1011.2016 issued by the 3rd respondent in respect of land admeasuring 5 acres in Sy. No. 150/6 of Mucherla village, Kandukur Mandal, to the petitioner's Iand admeasuring 3 acres in Sy. No. 155/1-d of the same village and dispossessing the petitioner from her land without paying compensation under the provrsions of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquasition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as being illegal. arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice, and violative of Art. 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from the said land except in accordance with law
I.A.NOi1 QF2017(WPMP. NO:13'144 OF 20171
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavat filed in support of the petition, the High Caurt rflay be pleased to direct the respondents not dispossess the petitioner from the land admeasuring 3 acres
I
in Sy. No. 15o11-d of Mucheria village, KandukurI\4andal, R R. District,pendang disposal of the above writpetition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI G. YETTAIAH
Counsel for Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.1O6O1 of 2OL7
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner hled a Memo, dated 07.O2.2O23 seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to approach this Court as and when cause of action arose.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition
shall stand closed.
SD'.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANTREGISTRAR /-: //TRUECOPY/I L--!l) SECTIONOFFICER
To, Stateor rerang a na ro U r l 1.) ?,13 33JifS r" r'o?'F;x:nt",:ilf; tT'il?i' "" TwoCD CoPies MBC BS Be\
HIGH COURT
DATED: 0910212023
t{E s T4 Iq
+
cJ ,1
24 UAfl2m
ORD ER
WP.No.10601 of2017
DISMISSING THE WR!T PETITION AS WITHDRAWN,
WITHOUT COSTS
,6
unTrU,=
Mrs. Vislavath Chavali
State of Telangana
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
