Dismissed

Yekula Amrutham v. The State of Telangana and 4 others

Telangana HC9 Feb 2023WP/45146/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana permitted the withdrawal of a writ petition filed under Article 226 regarding the attachment of the petitioner's salary. The court dismissed the petition accordingly without costs.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition was accorded; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue alternative remedies.

Yekula Amrutham Vs The State of Telangana and 4 others — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[32s6 I

¶2

HIGH COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction) TIIURSDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY .fWO'fHOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT

¶4

THE HONOURABLE Szu JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 45146 OF 2022 Between:

¶5

Yekula Amrutham. S/o Venkaiah Occ. Work Inspeclor, Occ. Work Inspector O/o GRlll Sub-Devision At Neereducherla^(MD) Suryapet District, R/o H.No. l-123 Near^Water Tank Thatikole (V[) Devarkonda Nalgonda District.

¶6

...PETITIONER

¶7

AND

¶8

l. The State ol T'elangana, Represented By its Principal Secretary, Stamps^and Registration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶9

The Registrar ol Chits, Government of Telangana O/o The Commissioner^and Inspector Gencral Registration and stamps^{MJ Market,Hyderabad. NalgondaDistrict}

¶10

The Arbitral Tribunal of Sole Arbitrator,^Rep.By its^{Dist.Judge(Retd,) Himayatnagar,} Hyderabad

¶11

M/S Shriram City Union Finance Limited. Miryalguda Rep. By its^Authorized Signatory and power of Attorney^I lolder Mr.K.Srinivasulu S/o Rangaiah^Age.44 years R-/o Miryalguda

¶12

The Deputy Executive Erigineer, O/o^Irrigation Gr-111^{Sub-DivisionOfEce} Miryalguda Nalgonda District.

¶13

...RESPONDENTS

¶14

Petition under Article 226 of thc Constitution of India^{praying that in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit ftled therewith, the High Court^may be^pleasedto issue an Writ of Mandamus appropriate^Writ order or direction^{declaringthe action of} the 5th respondent in withholding the salary of the^{petitionerby issuing the warrant} dated 09/l I l2OZ2 E.P. 495 of 2021 in A.R.B.No.²²² of^{2019 on the file of V} Addt.District Judge at Miryalguda, by setting^{aside the sameand consequentlydirect the} respondents not to deduct the salaries of the^petitioner in^{the interestofjustice,}

¶15

IA NO: I OF 2022

¶16

Petition under Section l5l CPC^praying that in the circumstances^{stated in the} affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court may be pleased to grant stay of} all proceedings in^pursuant to the salary^{attachmentwarrant dated 09.11.2022 in 8P.495} of 2021 in A.R.8.N.o.222 of 2Ol9 on the file of^{the V Addl. District Judgeat} Miryalguda.

¶17

Counsel for the Petitio ner(s):SRI. GOVTND REDDY KONTHAM

¶18

Counsel for the Respo rdents I to 3: CP FOR STAMPS ANI) REGISTR{TION

¶19

Counscl for the Respo rdent 4: SRI. N SRIKANTH GOUD, SC

¶20

Counsel for the Respo rdcnt 5: GP FOR IRRI AND COMM ARE,/. ltE,

¶21

The Court made the fr llowing: ORDER

¶22

THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.45146 of 2022

¶23

ORDER:

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative remedies as available under law.

¶25

Permission is accorded and the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as sought for by the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶26

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.

¶27

//TIIUE COPYI/

¶28

SD/-L,SHIVA PARVATHI ASSISTANT RE ISTRAR

¶29

SECTION FFICER

¶30

To,

¶31

L One CC to SRI. GOVIND REDDY KONTHAM, Advocate topucl 2' Two ccs to GP Fon s'fAMps AND REGISTRATIoN, High court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabacl. [OUT]

¶32

TWO CCS tO GP FOR IRRI AND COMM AREA DEV, High COUrt fOr thc StAtE Of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OU1-]

¶33

Two CCs to SRI. N SRIKANTII GOUD, I{igh Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OU1']

¶34

Two CD Copies

HTGH COIJRT

<br>

MSK,J

DATED:0910^t 12023

i. S IATE
/'
,/, ,.
? 1 [:ii ?r-]

¶40

ORDER

¶41

WP.No.4514ri of 2022

¶42

WP IS DISNTISSED AS WITHDRA WN WITHOUT COSTS

Yekula Amrutham v. The State of Telangana and 4 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yekula Amrutham v. The State of Telangana and 4 others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Damera Ramsudhakar Rao Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others

Bommala Srinivas Vs The state of Telarigana

Lanka Rajaram Vs Syed Saleemuddin

Smt.G.Saraswathi Bai and 12 Others Vs The State of Telangana and 3 Others

Smt. a. Vijaya Vs The State of Telangana, And 4 Others

Mrs. Vislavath Chavali Vs State of Telangana