Damera Ramsudhakar Rao v. The State of Telangana and 5 others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Telangana High Court closed a Writ Petition challenging land acquisition proceedings after the State Government submitted that acquisition has been dropped. The judgment held no examination on merits was necessary as no proceedings remain.
What did the court decide?
Writ Petition No.33128 of 2022 is closed without costs; no order as to costs; other pending applications closed.
What the court decided
IIIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT IIYDERABAD
[32s6 I
(Spccial Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT
TIIE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDTIEER KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO:33128 OF 2022
Between:
/
Damera Ramsudhakar Rao, $/o O.n.f.nunga Rao, Occ. Business, R-/o. H Dr.K.K.R.SchooI Lane, Sri Sainagar, Kukatpally, Tirumalgiri, Hyderabad
t6-2-153/122, /.
...PE'I'ITIONER
ANT)
- The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Princip/(ecretary Revenue Department lEndowment) Secretariat, Hyderabad. t
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Writ Petition challenging the land acquisition proceedings should be examined on merits given that the acquisition proceedings have been dropped.
Whether the Writ Petition challenging the G.O.R.T.No.488 and preliminary notification regarding land acquisition should be closed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Damera Ramsudhakar Rao
- respondent
The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department (Land Acquisition) Secretariat
- respondent
The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary Revenue Department (Endowment) Secretariat
- respondent
The District Collector, Jagtiyala District
- respondent
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jagtiyala Division
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/33128/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court