In a writ petition challenging dispossession from patta land, the petitioner submitted that the cause for adjudication did not survive. The court recorded this submission and dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without costs, closing the pending miscellaneous petition.
No costs; pending miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
WRIT PETITION NO:4513 OF 2016
Between:
M.Chandra Shekar, S/o M.Lingaiah Aged about 53years Occ Agriculture Rl/o Tandur village and Mandal Adilabad District,
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndiapraying thatin the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in trying to interfere and dispossess the petitioner by fixing the boundary stonesin thepatta landin survey No.699/2 extent Ac 0.8'1 cents situated at Tandur village andMandal, Adilabad District taking advantage of the order vide Rc No. E3/4780/2015 dated 05.01 .2016 issued by the District Collector without following theprocedure prescribed under the land assignment policy and without approval of the assignment Review Committee and only basing on the instructions of Ministeras illegal, arbitrary and unco nstitutional and also violative of Article 14,'16 and 3004 of Constitution of lndia consequently direct the respondentsnot tointerferewith the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land
t.A. NO: 1 0F 2016(WPMP. NO: 5779 0F 2016)
Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents not interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land in survey No.6g9/2 extent Ac 0.gl cents situated at randur Village and Mandal, Adilabad District pending disposal of the main writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. cUDl MADHUSUDHAN REDDY
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 to 4: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.5: None Appeared
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO
VIRIT PETITION No.4513 of2O16
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication.
is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if aly, shall stand closed
SD/-V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGIS R
//TRUE COPY//
SECTI N OFFICER
To,
$rv
HIGH COURT
DATED:2811112023
ORDER
1tl e STArt-
15 0E[ 2[23 a
c)o
.+
.t.
i
o5-.q pf icr.;
WP.No.4513 of 2016
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTOUS WITHOUT COSTS
.\1-}
\').),Nu
\3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition praying for intervention in land adjudication survives for adjudication.
M.Chandra Shekar
State of Telangana
J SREENIVAS RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
