This contempt case sought punishment for willful disobedience of a High Court interim order. The court observed that the main writ petition had been disposed of. Consequently, no further adjudication was required and the contempt case was closed without costs.
Contempt case closed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3303 ]
lN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATEOF TELANGAI.IA AT HYDERABD
FRIDAY,THE TWENW FOURTHDAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE JSREENIVAS RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: A78 OF2011
Contempt Case uMer Sections10 to12 of Contemptof Courts Act to punish the respondents herein willfullyand disobeying the orders of the High Court dated 05-12-2009Passed in W.P.M.P.No.34632of 2off)in Writ Petition No.26590 of 2009
Between
Smt. Sushama Kaur, Wo Sardarlndrajit Singh,Resident of FlatNo.11 1' Saraswathi Block,Kamshetty Enclaves, Ramanthapur,
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONOENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner :SRl. Y SUDHAKAR
Counsel for the Respondents: AGPFOR REVENUE
The Court made the following:ORDER
I
I
,/
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO
CONTEMFI CASE No. 878 of 2O11
ORDER:
The contempt case is frled seeking to punish the respondents under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for deliberate and willful disobedience in implementing the interim order passed by this Court in W.P.M.P.No.34632 of 2OO9 in W.P.No.26S9O of 2OO9, dated 05.r2.2009.
Pending rniscellaneous applications, if any,
shall stand closed.
SD/- M.MANJULA DEPUTY REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
HIGH COURT
DATED:2411112023
1Et.4
& .?.1
..-S"^<br>,a o*
<."
oLL <br>J
lrc IH * o'
ORDER
GC.No.878 of 2011
CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS
?"{"\
-l
Smt. Sushama Kaur
Sri Mruthanjaya Sahu
Sri Lakshmi Narayana Reddy
Sri Suresh
J. Sreenivas Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
