Disposed

Nayikoti Suneetha W/o Valmiki v. The District Collector,Medak district

Telangana HC24 Nov 2023WP/3154/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus for granting a Pattadar Pass Book and patta certificates. Granting liberty to the petitioner to apply for mutation of her name in revenue records via the Dharani Portal under new laws, directing respondents to process the application within two months.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to apply for mutation of name on the Dharani Portal; Respondents directed to consider the application and pass appropriate orders within two months.

Nayikoti Suneetha W/o Valmiki Vs The District… — Land Acquisition | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[³³⁰³ ]

¶2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶3

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO: 3154 OF 2014

¶7

Between:

¶8

Nayikoti Suneetha W/o Valmiki, aged about 37 years, Occ Agriculture and Housewife, R/o Narsapur (V) and (tr/), tvledak District

¶9

...PETITIONER AND

¶10

The District Collector, IMedak district, at Sangareddy -5O2OO1 2. The Tahsildar, Narsapur (V) & (M), N4edak District.502313

¶11

...RESPONDENTS

¶12

Petition under Article 226 ot the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ of lVlandamus or any other appropriate Direction Declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not granting Pattadar Pass Book and patta certificates with regard to agricultural land admeasuring Ac.2=06 gts in survey No.8O/1 situate at Narsapura Village and ltlandal and N/edak District as illegal, arbitrary, unjustifiable and further Direct the Respondents to issue pattadar pass Books and Patta certificates to the petitioner.

¶13

l.A. NO: 1OF 2O14(WPMP. NO: 3873 0F 2014)

¶14

Petition under Section^'1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order of interim stay of dispossession of the Petitioner from the Petition land admeasuring Ac. 2=06 gts situate in Survey No.80/1 of Narsapur Village and Mandal, Medak District.

¶15

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.GANESH RAO

¶16

Counsel for the Respondent No.1 & 2: AGP FOR REVENUE

¶17

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶18

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

¶19

UIRTT PETITION No.3154 of 2Ol4

¶20

ORDE R:

¶21

This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:

¶22

"to rssue Writ of Mand.amus or ang other appropriate Diection Declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not gintinq pattadar Pass Book and patta certificates Lith ,egord to agricaltural land ad.measuing Ac.2_06 gts. tn..-surueg No.BO/ 1 situated it irrrcLprro Village and Mandal and Med.ak Dr.stncf as illegal, arbitrary, unjustifiable ord- 1urth., Direct the Respondenis to i.ssue pattadar pass Books and^patta certificates to tLt peti.tioner.,,

¶23

Heard Sri S.Ganesh Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government pleader lor Revenue appearing on beharf of respondent Nos. I and 2

¶24

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing on behall of respondent Nos. I and 2 submits that during the ) pende5rcy of the writ petition, the State of Telangana, rvhile repe.4ling the Pattadar pass Books Act. 1971 introduced Record of Rights under the Telangana Rights in land and Pattadar pass Books Act, 2O2O

¶25

¶26

(Telangana Act^{No-9 of 2O2Ol and also framedRules} (Assignment-I) vide G.O.Ms.No.4,^Revenue department,^{dated l2'Ol'2O21and by virtue of the} new enactrnent^{and Rules thereunder' the petitioner} may be granted^{liberty to rnake an application seeking} mutation of her^{name in thereventlerecords in} respect^of ttre^{subject property in the Dharani Portal'}

¶27

In view of ttre^{above said submissions'the Writ} Petition is^{disposed of granting liberty tothe} petitioner to make^{necessaryapplication invokingthe} Rules under^{DharaniPortal within a period oftwo} (O2) weeks from^{the date of receiptof a copy of this} order and on^{such application being made' the} respondents^{aredirected to consider the same and} pass appropriate^{orders ina'ccordance '*'ithlaw} within two months^thereafter'

¶28

Accordingly,^{the Writ Petition is disposed ofNo} costs.

¶29

I )

¶30

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall

¶31

stand closed.

¶32

SD/. K. AMMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTIOfdIFFICER

To,

1 The District Collector,^{Medak district, at Sangareddy - 502001} 2 The Tahsildar, Narsapur^{(V) & (N/) tvledak, District- 502313} 3 One CC to SRI S.GANESH^{RAO, Advocate} [OPUC] 4 Two CCs to GP FOR^{REVENUE, High Courtfor the Stateof Telangana at} Hyderabad [OUT] 5 Two CD Copies BSR SB \4-,"

HIGH COURT

r I I

DATED: 2411112023

ORDER

WP.No.3154 of 2014

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS

¶43

\1,^):)

Nayikoti Suneetha W/o Valmiki v. The District Collector,Medak district

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nayikoti Suneetha W/o Valmiki v. The District Collector,Medak district

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S. Janardhan Reddy Vs The State of Telangana

Basva Ramadevi, Vs The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary

Koppula Raju Vs M.Jaya Sree

Smt. Raju Bai, Vs Sri Ramesh, Tahsildar

Smt. Sushama Kaur, Vs Sri Mruthanjaya Sahu

Kammati Yadhagiri, Vs The District Collector