A. Sridhar, v. State of Telangana Represented by its Principal Secretary
Telangana HCWP/43891/2017
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging discontinuation of veterinary training closed because Respondent claimed the petitioner was already appointed and grievance resolved, requiring no further adjudication.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
[3303 ]
¶2
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OFTELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
¶3
WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTIETHDAY OFAUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTHREE
¶4
I
¶5
(
¶6
PRESENT
¶7
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICEJ.SREENIVASRAO
¶8
WRIT PETITION NO: 43891 OF2017
¶9
Between:
¶10
A. Sridhar, S/o.Venkataiah,Aged37 years,Occ ;Unemployed' R/o.H.No 10-3-49/4' Ganga Nilayam, Vidyanagar,Karimnagar-505001.
¶11
.....PETITIONER
¶12
AND
¶13
- 1, State of Telangana, Represented byits Principal Secretary, Annual Husbandry department Secretariat,Hyderabad.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
A. Sridhar
- respondent
State of Telangana
Coram
AI extract
J. Sreenivas Rao
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- WP/43891/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court