No. A.P.9 Z 22O on the route No.250, wht:re cc,n str'.rction of a Flyover Bridge !:als being undertakt'n, there was no proper roarl and while the petitioner was tryin13 t() escape an acciden l.o a scooter who was comir,g from the wrong side, the Bt'gumpet Flyover touched to tLe bur; itrcl caused minor dam,rge to top roof sheet of the bus. Ear;in13 on the accident, the respondent-Corporation issue d a charge sheet on'.'.3.O1. .2OO2 and the petitior er s rtrmitted an explanation requesting to drop the charges lerelled against the petitiorrer. The respondent-Corporation having not satisfied with the same initiated regular enquiry. Basing on the enquiry report submitted by the encruiry olfict:r dated O1.O2.2OO2 the respondent-Corporation ir;sue<l show cause notic,: asking as to why the petitio rer src,u1<l not be removed fr, rm the services. Thereafter, the clisc iplinary authority itnlrosed punishment of deferment of annual increment firr a period of two years with cumtLlzLtive effect, in additionr o recoveryr of an amount of Rs. I,OOO I - towards cost and darnages.
