Writ petition regarding reinstatement and gratuity was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear for multiple hearings despite notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[31671
IN THE HIGHCOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial OriginalJurisdiction)
MONDAY,THETWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSANDANDTWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLESRIJUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO:4211 0F 2013
Between:
h Aoed about 58 Years,Occ: Retired Ivlanohar Sinqh S/oLate SheetalSing 'beiot Rio H No.'186-78, Out Side Aob-e to+ia+ nPsntc,MiYaPur ll Gowliguda,HYderabad. 023.
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDET.ITS
Petition under. Atticle226 of the constitutionof lndia praying that in the circumstancesstatedintheaffidavitfiledtherewith,theHighCourtmaybe oleasedtolssueanappropriateWritororderordirectionmoreparticularlyonein il;""tr; oiWnli Cjifrltnf..f OnUf US declaring that the petitioner was reinstated int,o service with continuityof service in compiiance with the directions issued in nr[p"ii"o intD.No. {SSIZOOOon the fite of Labour court-lon 3-5-2001 and gi;"n- prorotion from conductorto controller/ADCpost vide officeorderNo. Frmritr)izoro-Myp-ttdated 7-6-2010 but on the dateof petitioneis retirement on zo_il'-zolz videorder No. 01/.756(1)/2012-Myp-llfrom service on attaining i;";g" oa irpurrnnr"tioni.e. 58 yeais'notpayTel!of gratuity for the period of i"*lirtion orderdated3-5-1996 io the date of retirementsfrom service is as iri"grl,-r"irrt contraryto tawand violation of principles of Naturat Justiceand ,g;i"it thlt Atticlest+, 16 and 21 of the Constitutionof lndiaand consequently Jir"ltrg tn"respondents to pay the gratuityfor the periodof not on duty
Counsel for thePetitioner: SRIMANOHARSINGHS/O LATE SHEETALSINGH
Counsel for theRespondents:THOOM SRINIVAS (SC FOR TSRTC)
The Court madethe following:ORDER
) )
1 (
(,'
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.4211 of 201.3
ORDER:
On 23.01.2023, rvhen the present Writ Petition was taken up, it was reported that Sri Mohd. Ghousuddin, the learned counsel on record, has expired, as such, notice was ordered to the petitioner and the present Wrjt Petition was directed to be posted on20.02.2023. Or:L20.02.2023, r'r,hen the matter was taken up, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, though notice was served on him. Therefore, this Court directed the Regishy to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list and post the writ petition under the caption'For Orders' on 0L.03.2023. Thereafter, the matter was adjourned tu,ice. On 16.03.2023, when the matter was taken up, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner though his name was printed in the cause list. Having regard to the same, this Court has directed the Registry to list the present Writ I']etition on 20.03.2023 under the caption 'For Dismissai'. Even today, there is no representation for the peti tioner
AAR, J W.P.No.42l I of 2013
2
,': ir
Having regard to theabove,this Court is of the opinion that the petitioner is notinterestedto pursue the present Writ
Petition
Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed fornon-
prosecution.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand
closed. There shall be no order as to costs
SD/.G.SIREESHA AsstsrANr#GlsrRAR //TRUE COPY/'
I \
SECTION OFFICER
To, 1 One CC to SRIManohar Sin oh S/o Late SheetalSingh Advocate [OPUC] 2 One CC to SRI THOOMSRI Nvns(sc FoR rsRrc) [oPucl 3. Two CD CoPies BN BS 4.-
HIGH COURT
DATED:2010312023
ORDER
WP.No.4211 of 2013
ol:
{ gsr
f.
[ 5 \i[\ NE /i
-:):'r)
'.'t
c
r'l . rt(
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
,
f<br>v
Ivanohar Singh
A.P.S.R.T.C.
A. Abhishek Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
