Disposed

Smt.S.Prabhavathi v. Smt.Dasari Hari Chandana, I.A.S

Telangana HC20 Mar 2023CC/1357/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt case filed for allegedly violating an order in WP No. 23134 of 2021, the court held that the earlier order had been complied with. The case was closed with liberty to the petitioner to challenge subsequent proceedings before the appropriate forum.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed; liberty granted to petitioner to challenge subsequent proceedings before the appropriate forum.

Smt.S.Prabhavathi Vs Smt.Dasari Hari Chandana, I.A.S — Contempt of Court | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

[31671

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE^{OF TELANGANA} AT HYDERABAD

¶3

MONDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF^MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE^SRI JUSTICE^{A.ABHISHEK REDDY}

¶6

CONTEM PT GASE NO: 1357^{OF 2022}

¶7

Contempt Case under Sections¹⁰ lo^{12 of Contempt of CourtsAct 1971} to punish the respondents for their^{willful disobedienceof order dated23-09-} 2021 passed in WP No.23134 of^2021.

¶8

Between:

¶9

Smt.S.Prabhavathi, W/o S.Venkat Reddy,^{Aged about 80 Years' Occ.House} Wife, Fl/o H.No.1 7-1 -382IKSB/43, Balaji Nagar,^{Saidabad,Hyderabad.}

¶10

...CONTEMPT PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

Smt.Dasari Hari Chandana, l.A.S, The^{DistrictCollector, Narayanpet,} Narayanpet District.

¶13

Y.P.Ramesh, The Tahsildar, Dhanwada^{Mandal, O/o.Tahsildaroffice,} Dhanwada' Narayanpet District

¶14

.....NTEMN.RS/

¶15

(Respondent Nos.2 & 3 in WP.No.2313412021)

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. HARI KISHAN^KUDIKALA

¶17

Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE

¶18

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶19

]'HE HON'BLE SIU JUS'I'ICE A. AI}I{ISIItiK REDDY

¶20

CONTE,MPT CASE No.l357 of 2022

¶21

ORDER:

¶22

Alleging violation of the order dated 23.09.2021 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.23¹³⁴ of^{2021, the prescnt} Contempt Case has been filed

¶23

Learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record a copy of proceedings bearing No.D/TM33/58812023 datcd 2-5.01.2023, a perusal of which shows that the application of the petitioner has been rejected by the respondent No. I

¶24

Havlng regard to the fact that the above said order ol this

¶25

Court has been complied with, this Contempt Case is closed granting liberty to the petitioner to challenge the proceedings dated 25.01.2023 issued by the respondent No.l,^{before the}

¶26

appropriate forum, if she is so advised.

¶27

¶28

Sd/. K.SAILESHI DEPUry REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ,.-f-, -/-SECTION OFFICER

¶29

To,

¶30

One CC to^{SRl.HARIKISHAN KUDIKALA,Advocate [OPUC]}

¶31

2.TwoCCstoGPFoRREVENUE(TG),HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana. tourl

¶32

Two CD^CoPies

HIGH COURT

AAR,J

DATED:2010312023

,1 .- ;-. '
_/ ?,
[i [- t<br>

ORDER

CC.No.1357 of²⁰²²

CLOSING THE^CC

c"64 &"o,-.fftr,

Smt.S.Prabhavathi v. Smt.Dasari Hari Chandana, I.A.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt.S.Prabhavathi v. Smt.Dasari Hari Chandana, I.A.S

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V. Rajaiah, Vs Sri A.K Khan, IPS

E.Nageswara Rao, Vs Sri A.K Khan IPS

Ram Vilas, Vs the Union of India, Rep. by Se. Min. of Home Affairs and 3

Manohar Singh S/o Late Sheetal Singh, Vs The A.P.S.R.T.C. rep.by its Vice Chairman/

The Depot Manager, Apsrtc Manthani Depot Vs The Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court

The Senior Regional Manager, F.C.I., Hyd and 1, Vs v.Muralidhar Rao, HYDERABAD-16 and 1