Dismissed

Chinvath Kalya v. State of Tg,Prl.Scy,Revenue,Hyd,and 8

Telangana HC11 Jul 2023WP/41002/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Telangana permitted the withdrawal of Writ Petition No. 41002 of 2016, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution and Section 51 of the CPC. The petition sought a writ of mandamus and interim relief regarding a land dispute. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal of the writ petition as withdrawn without order as to costs.

Chinvath Kalya Vs State of Tg,Prl.Scy,Revenue,Hyd,and 8 — Property and Title | Telangana HC (2023)

¶1

¶2

132521

¶3

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 41002 OF 2016

¶8

Between:

¶9

Chinvath Kalya, S/o. Late Hachya, aged about 73^years, Occ:^Agriculture, R/o. Gaddamidi Thanda H/o. Maisigandi (V), Kadthal Mandal, Ranga Reddy^District.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

The State of Telangana, Rep. by its^Principal Secretary,^Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

¶13

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Kandukur Division,^{(previously under} Mahabubnagar Division) Ranga Reddy District.

¶14

The Tahsildar, Kadthal Mandal, Ranga Reddy^District. 4. Chinavath Dashya, S/o. Hachya, aged:^{Major, Occ:} Agriculture,^Rl/o.

¶15

) Gaddamidi Thanda H/o. Maisigandi^(V), Kadthal^Mandal, Ranga^Reddy District

¶16

Chinavath Chandi, W/o. Lal Singh, aged:^{Major, Occ: Household,Rl/o.} Gaddamidi Thanda H/o. Maisigandi^(V), Kadthal^{Mandal, Ranga Reddy} District.

¶17

Chinavath Bikshya, S/o. Lachiya, aged:^{Ma.ior,Occ: Agriculture,Rl/o.} Gaddamidi Thanda Hio. Maisigandi^(V), Kadthal^{Mandal, Ranga Reddy} District.

¶18

Chinavath Lalya, S/o. Lachiya, aged:^{Maior, Occ:} Agriculture,^{R/o. Gaddamidi} Thanda H/o. Maisigandi (V), Kadthal Mandal,^Ranga Reddy^District. 8. Chinavath Sakri, W/o. Hachya, aged: Major,^Occ: Agriculture,^{R/o. Gaddamidi} Thanda H/o. Maisigandi (V), Kadthal^{Mandal, RangaReddy District.} L Chinavath Googa, S/o. Mangla, aged:^{Major, Occ:Agriculture,Ryo.} Gaddamidi Thahda H/o. Maisigandi^(V), Kadthal^{Mandal, Ranga Reddy} District'

¶19

...RESP.NDENTS

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of^{lndiaprayingthat in the} circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the^{High Court may be} pleased to issue an order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3'd respondent^{in issuingthe impugned} endorsement dated 21-11-2016 in file No.B/109/2016 in directing^{the petitioner to} approach civil court for settlement of the dispute^of the^{landin Sy. No.461} admeasuring Ac. 10-22 guntas, instead of implementing^{the order of the 2nd} respondent passed in file No.B/ROR/504112013, dated 30-09-2016^{by recording}

¶21

¶22

the name {)f t.'to p{)titioner as pattadar and possess,>r to itn extent of Ac. 9-32 guntas in Sy. fJc 4r)1. as illegal, unlawful, contrary to aw ard :onsequen y direct the 3rd resporcl: rt to implement the order passed b', the I nri respondent dated 30-09-2016 by : rl,, implementing the name of the pelitcn,:,r as pattadar and possessor in th€. ll()R to an extent of Ac. 9-32 guntas tn Sy. No 461 and issue pattadar pass bo( k and title deed in his favour and horveve. .hoy \r'/ill be subject to the decision of lh , r;ivil court to be initiated by the res )ondent:, 4 to 9 by clarming their alleged res[) rclrve shares in the said land as directed by 'e 2rd respondent. l.A. NO: f OF 20 ,| PMP. NO: 50509 OF 2016)

¶23

Petition urr e. Section r 51 cPC praying that in the cir:Lr.nstances stated in the affidavit filed i s,upport of the petition, the High Corrt rray lre pleased to grant interim order dirr: ;tirg the 3rd respondent to implem,)nt tho :)rd€ r dated 30_09_ 20'16 passe,l bv ll e 2nd respondent in file No. B/ROR/r04,1./i0.3 by recording the name of the pelit r nr:r::s pattadar and possessor in the ROFI ol the land rn Sy. No. 461 to an extent⁽ f ,\c^g-32 gunlas at Kadthal village ancl lVlar.dal Ranga Reddy District, witlrout rr lerence to the endorsement dated .a1-11-2016 ssued by him, pdnding disposa r f rnain Writ Petitron.

¶24

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶25

Between:

¶26

1 Kandukuri N ardini, W/o Sudhakar Reddy, aged about 54 y:rars, Occ. Household, es;ident of H No.9-Z-354. lrilaruthi Nagar, lh;rn-pat,et, Ranga Reddy Di;t' :t

¶27

2 Devarshi Sr lhar, S/o D. lVlahadev, aged about 37 yeaft;, rosid(rnt of 3_2lt3g, Vinayaka Ni ,g:rr, Opp: BRC INFRA, pappalaguda, llydei rt,ad.

¶28

AND

¶29

... Petitioners/prot)osed Party 10 & 1.1

¶30

Chinvath K: y;r,.S/o. Late Hachya, aged about ,'3 ./ears Or;c: Agriculture, R/o. Gaddar ric i Thanda H/o. Maisigandi (V), Kad:hai M rr,Jal, Ran!a Reddy District.

¶31

.. . ReriF'ono ent/Petitioner

¶32

The lltate ,:l^Telangana, ,^{Rep. by its prin< ipal {;€ lretlry, Revenue} Departme,rt, 'jr:cretariat, Hyderabad.

¶33

The ReverrLr, Irivisional Offrcer, Kandukur Division (previ:t.slv tnder lt4ahabubna< ,ar Division) Ranga Reddy District.

¶34

The Tahsi da .^(adthal Mandal, Ranga Reddy Drstr,ct

¶35

Chinavath Dr ,slrya, S/o. l.l_"9hy" aged: Majoi, Occ: Agrror lt_rre, R/o. Gaddamidi^-I randa H/o. Ir4aisigandi (V), Ka'dthal Mzrnd':tt llanga Reddy

¶36

Districl

¶37

¶38

Chinavath Chandi, Wo. Lal Singh, aged:^Major, Occ:^{Household,Rl/o.} Gaddamidi Thanda H/o. Maisigandi^(V), Kadthal [\4andal,^{Ranga Reddy} Diskict.

¶39

Chinavath BiKshya, S/o. Lachiya, aged:^{Major, Occ:} Agriculture,^R/o. Gaddamidi Thanda H/o. Maisigandi^(V), Kadthal lvlandal,^Ranga Reddy District.

¶40

Chinavath Lalya, S/o. Lachiya, aged:^Major, Occ: Agriculture,^{R/o. Gaddamidi} Thanda H/o. Maisigandi (V), Kadthal lvlandal, Ranga Reddy^District.

¶41

Chinavath Sakri, W/o. Hdchya, aged: Major, Occ: Agriculture,^{Fi/o. Gaddamidi} Thanda H/o. Maisigandi (V), Kadthal Mandal, Ranga Reddy Diskict.

¶42

Chinavath Googa, S/o. Ir/angla, aged: lvla.ior, Occ: Agriculture,^Rl/o. Gaddamidi Thahda H/o. tr/aisigandi^(V), Kadthal Mandal,^{Ranga Reddy} District

¶43

..Respondents/Respondents

¶44

Petition under Section 16-A of Writ Rules,^praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the^petition, the^{High Court maybe} pleased to implead the petitioners as party/respondents 10 & 11 to the above Writ Petition.

¶45

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M. DAMODAR REDDY

¶46

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 to 3: GP^{FOR REVENUE}

¶47

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4 to 9: SRI^G. RAMA^CHANDERRAO Counsel for the Proposed Respondents:^{SRI BETHIVENKATESHWARLU}

¶48

The Court made the following: ORDER

¶49

HON BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALI-I N'.NDA.

¶50

y A.m prUnOru ruo.elm: 2OL6

¶51

ORDER:

¶52

Learner I {:oUnsel for the petitioner brirrgs orr -ec()rd, the letter dated 1t5.07.2023 addressed to the R,:gistrar (J tdicial), High Court cf Telangana, at Hyderab;rd, :;e:ki rg the permission o' "he Court for withdrawal of the cres€)nt writ petition.

¶53

Permis! on is accorded.

¶54

Taking into consideratjon the contents o. ther letter dated 0-5.0'2.: 023, and on request of learned ccr nr;el for the petitioner, thr p resent writ petition is dismissed as vrithdrawn. However, ther^,: shall be no order as to costs.

¶55

Miscellian lc us petitions, if any, pending in this Writ

¶56

Petition, shal sta n d closed,

¶57

SD/-A./.S. PRASAD ,{SSISL\NT REGISTRAR

¶58

//TRUE COPY//

¶59

t- !;E CTION OFFICER

¶60

To, 1. One CC to S^ill. M. DATMODAR REDDy Advocate [r)ptJC' 2. Two CCs kr⁽ iP for Revenue, High Court for the St2 te of i e :ng rna at Hyderabad. l( rUTl

¶61

One CC: to St L G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare One CC: to St L G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare CC: to St L G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare to St L G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare St L G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare L G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare CHANDER RAO Advocare Advocare [opu(;]

¶62

One CC: to St L G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare One CC: to St L G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare CC: to St L G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare to St L G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare St L G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare L G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare G. RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare RA|\4A CHANDER RAO Advocare CHANDER RAO Advocare Advocare [opu(;] 4 One CC to SF L BETHT VENKATESHWARLU, Advc,cite [()t:UC] 5. Two CD Copi rs

CHR LS

HIGH COU {

DATED:1 1t0'112023

ORDER

W.P.No.41tt02 of 2016

¶70

.11 ,=2
//;ttli,,, :i1ATG Or >+;
(-
TS c)
tl
:I $$t
't
)
I
,'li-
t:, 4. :- , . l: f'Afj ar

¶71

DISMISSINS THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDITAWN WITHOUT^I)()STS

¶72

@ra': {o--..(-r*"

Chinvath Kalya v. State of Tg,Prl.Scy,Revenue,Hyd,and 8

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chinvath Kalya v. State of Tg,Prl.Scy,Revenue,Hyd,and 8

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharath Degree College for Women, Vs The Director, Social Welfare Department

Patnam Balaiah Vs The State of Telangana

Kolkonda Anutej Vs The State of Telangana

Kamran Mirza Vs State of Telangana

D. Ravinder Vs The State of Telangana

K. Narasimha Reddy Vs The State of Telangana