Kamran Mirza v. State of Telangana
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 8435 of 2020 as withdrawn by the petitioner via counsel on 16.06.2023, without making an order as to costs.
The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No. 8435 of 2020 as withdrawn by the petitioner via counsel on 16.06.2023, without making an order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[32521
HIGH COURT FOR THE S.I r.o";o,'6'I5,3i flSj::,fliAr HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THI
,worrciuiiEnEliXE\r#.rfi""?i,*E."
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE SUREPALLI NANDA
WRIT PETITIONN o.843soF 2020
Between:
Kamran Miza, S/o.late ucc'Business, ruo.u.ruo e-"1bl ^samadShakeeb ' :?,J,?ff f,";lgy,,#16p1ii1t#'uHl.Tfl #ilryi,,t,,{#: years,occ"Bu-s;;'H,#,i:r;.,:_niX;it1 j#r'#*i1,:L.;1t",'r$H:[,.,
AND
...PETITIONER
...RESPONDENTSthat in the
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying ...RESPONDENTSthat in the crrcumstances stated in the affida vit filed therewith, the High Cou( may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularl y one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the act ion of the respondents and their subordinates in trying to interfere with peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over ad the measuringland beaAc.'16nng sy.no.139, -16 Gts., situated correlated at Saidabadto T.S.No 2 Ward No.172 Block-E, due procedure Hyderabad, without following contemplated under law as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, Articles u nco n stitutio 14 2 n l a l,and violative 300-4 of of the Constitution p rinciples of naturalof lndia, and consequenfly direct justice and also in violation ofthe respondent s not to interfere with possession and enJoyment of the petitioner over the subject land without followin g the procedure co ntemplated under law IA NO: 10F2 020
Petition under Section-'r51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit.fired in support of.the petition, iiru"Hilr,'ior.t may be preased to direct the respondents and their subordinates not to i,iteriere with peacefur possession 310 .gnl0vmgntof the petitioner over the tana neairng sy.no,.r 3g, correrated to I lNg2, Ward No.172, Btock-E, "Or"r.rring-Ac.i6_16 cts., situated at saidabad, Hyderabad, without fofiowing tre prolEoure contemprated under raw, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRt MOHD. MOIN AHMED eUADRI Counsel for the Respondents: Gp FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: OROER
HON,BLEMRS JUSTICESUREPALLI NANDA 5 oF2 2o w ITPETITIONNo.84
ORDER:
Mr. Mohd.Moin Ahmed Quadri,learned counselfor the petitionerfiled letter dated 16'06'2023 before the Registrar (Judicial),HighCourt for State of Telangana' Hyderabad' and statedthat the petitioner requestedhimto withdrawthe Present writ Petition.
Taking intoconsideration the contents of the letterdated 16.06.2023,and the submissionsof learned counsel for the petitioner, the writpetitionis dismissed as withdrawn' H owever, there shallbe no order as to costs'
Miscellaneouspetitions,if any,pending shall stand closed'
SD/- P. PADMANABHAREDDY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY// SECT OFFICER
To,
$t(-
HIGH COURT
DATED:1110712023
WP.No.8435 of 2020
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS
6
lr r
7 ,'
G\ ((
Kamran Miza
Principar secretary, Revenue Department
District Collector, Hyderabad District
SUREPALLI NANDA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court