The writ petition seeking pension and terminal benefits was dismissed as it had become infructuous due to the petitioner's death. The petition was abated with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3383 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEIVIBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION NO: 38954 OF 2017
Between:
V. Siva Shankar, S/o. Late V.C.Pakkiranna, aged about 64years, Retired Principal, Government l.T.l. Medchal, Medchal District.
...PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court maybe pleased to issue a writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other writ order or direction, to direct the Respondents topay full pension and all other terminal benefits like Gratuity amount of Rs.5,97,389/-, commutationand surrender leave for 276 and consequently directthe Respondents totreat the suspensionperiod from June,1998 to August, 2001 as onduty inviewof acquittal in the criminal case in C.C.No.1/2013 by the competentcriminal case videjudgment dated 14-12-2015 asper F.R. by declaringthe action ofthe Respondents in notpaying the allpensionary benefitsand other terminal benefits to the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary,u ncon stitutionaland void beingviolative of Arts.300-4 of the Constitution of lndia.'
|.A.NO:1 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 48328 OF 20171
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to pay all the pensionary benefits to the petitioner by considering the representation of the petitioner dated'1 7-06-2016 forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition-
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI RANGARAJULA RAJASEKHARA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : AGP FOR LABOUR
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : GP FOR SERVICES -l
The Court made the following ORDER
I
'/'
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
WRIT PETITION NO. 38954 OF 2017
ORDER:
Mr. Rargarajula Rajasekhara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the writ petition has become infructuous in view of death of the petitioner. Therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
abated. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
SD/- K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// (& SECTION OFFICER
To
SA GJP ${o
HIGH COURT
DATED:0211112023
ORDER
WP.No.38954 of 2017
irE STAI €
</, )F
e
J
o 1 :i N0'rl 7t23 az
.L
*
...t- I e t ,'l c o
: -:::---::--:?
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS ABATED WITHOUT COSTS.
,v'
t\u-
V. Siva Shankar
State of Telangana
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
