V.Amarender, v. The Executive Officer
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, who had sought admission to an Assistant Engineer post in a temple.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner, who had sought admission to an Assistant Engineer post in a temple.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3383 ]
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEIUBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICELAXMI NARAYANAALISHETTY
WRlT PETITION NO: 1421 OF 2017
Between:
V.Amarender, S/o NarasimhaRao, 36 Years,Asst.E ngineer, Sri Lakshmi Narasimhaswamy Vari DevasthanamYadadrigutta, Bhuvanagiri District, Telangana State
...PETITIONER
AND
...RES'ONDENTS
Petition under Article226 ofthe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavitfiled therewith, the High court may be pleased to grant appropriate relief morein the natureof writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the constitutionoflndia declaring theProceedings Rc. No.A1/908/2013, dt.28.10.2O16 and consequential Proceedingsin Rc.No. Allgo,t2ol , dt. 08.12.2016lssuedby the 151 Respondent as arbitrary,illegal, discriminatory and malafidevrolating Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitutionof lndia and set aside thesame and issue consequential directions directing the Respondents to forthwithconsider the case of the Petitioner for absorptionas Assistant Engineer(civil)against one of the two regular posts of Assistant Engineer (civil) existingin the 1st Respondenttemple and pay regularsalary taking into accountvariousorders passed earlier,with all consequentialbenefits, and further direct theRespondentsto continue to pay the statestandard schedule Rates to thePetitioner till absorbingthe Petitioner as Assistant Engineer(Civil)
l.A. NO:'t OF 2017(WPMP. N O: 1614 OF 20171
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Proceedings Rc.No.A 1190812013, dl. 28.10.2016 and consequential Proceedings in Rc.No. A1l9OBl201 , dt. 08.12.20'16 issued by the 1st Respondent pending disposal of the Writ Petition
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2017(WPMP. NO: 1615 OF 2017
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to forthwith consider the case of the petitioner for absorption against one of the two regular posts of Assistant Engineer (Civil) and pay the regular salary on par with regular Assistant Engineer (Civil) pending disposal of the Writ Petition
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. P. V. KRISHNAIAH
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI JAGAN MOHAN REDDY KOTHA
Counsel for the Respondent No.s.2&3: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY
U/RIT PETITION NO. 1421 0F 2017
ORDER
Mr. P. V. Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter to the Registry seeking permission for withdrawal on the ground that the cause in the writ petition does not survive.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
SD/. C. PRAVEEN KUMAR
//TRUE coPY/t
ASSISTANT REG ISTRAB--?- ---' SECTION OFFICER
To,
b,t)
HIGH COURT
DATED:0211112023
ORDER
e slAr€ Or
9
o
l 15 Nt\ 1$1
at
t
t oESPD {C'
WP.No.1421 of 2017
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS GI*t'
2 provisions across 2 enactments
V.Amarender
The Executive Officer, Sri Lakshmi Narasimhaswamy Vari Devasthanam
Commissioner of Endowments
State of Telangana
Laxmi Narayana Alishetty
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court