The petitioner challenged her suspension as a Special Officer. Counsel submitted that the cause of action had vanished due to the efflux of time. The Court accepted this and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous with costs barred.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3301 I
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION NO: 38940 OF 2013
Between:
Mrs. Busi Jyothirmoy, Wo G. Chandra Sekhar,50years, Special Officer, Kasturiba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya (KGBV) Regode R/o Regode, Medak District.
.....PETITIONER
AND
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, theHigh Court maybe pleased to issue a writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the action of the District Collector,MedakDistrict at Sangareddy in issuing Proceedings Rc.No.SpliKGBV12013 daled24.12.2013 keeping thepetitioner under suspension and also theProceedings of the
Secretary, APREI Society, Hyderabad issued in Rc.No.'146iC3-1106-13 dated 26.12.2013 ratifying the above Order of the Dit;trict Collector, is illegal, arbitrary and vitiated by mala fides apart from being viol.ative of theprovisions of the A.P. Education Act and set aside the same-
l.A.NO:1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 48389 OF 2013)
Petition Under Section'1 5'l CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspendproceedings of the of the District Collector, Medak District at Sangareddy issued in Rc.No. Spl/KGBVl2}13 dated 24.12.2013 keeping the petitioner under suspension and also the Procr:edings of the Secretary, APREI Society, Hyderabad issued in Rc.No. 146/C3-1/06-13 dated 26.12.2013 ratifying the above Order of the District Collector pendingr disposal of the writ petition.
I.A.NO:1 OF 2014(WPMP. NO: 9216 OF 2014)
Petition Under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, th e High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to immediately reinstate the petitioner into Service in the interest ofjustice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. VAISHNAVI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI P.V.KRISHNAIAH
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : G.P FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2, 5 & 7 : SRI G.BHASKAR
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 & 4 : M/s P.}IKALYANI (SC FOR RMSA)
Counsel for the Respondent No.6 : G.P FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following ORDER
\
THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE PULLA KARTHIK
WRIT PETITION No.3 8940 0F 2013
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, Ms. Vaishnavi, learned counsel representing Sri p. V. Krishnaiah, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that due to efflux of time the cause in the present writ Petition does not survive for adjudication and the
matter has become infructuous.
dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. No costs.
SD/- MOHD. SANA U ANSARI ASSISTA GISTRAR //TRUE COPYII
SECTION OFFICER
To
SA GJP g
HIGH COURT
DATED:2710912023
1 iT,:
( t,l,r-
t:
1 7 fl[T 2iI23
..
ORDER
WP.No.38940 of 2013
DISMISSING THE W.P
AS TNFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
0gcoP1.'
t
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication after the efflux of time.
Mrs. Busi Jyothirmoy
Government of Andhra Pradesh
Pulla Kartiik
Mohd. Sana u Ansari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
